Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Annuities > Variable Annuities

Broker Faces Missouri Suspension Over VA Exchanges

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Broker Faces Missouri Suspension Over VA Exchanges

By ARTHUR d. pOSTAL

Washington

Missouri Securities Commissioner David Cosgrove issued a March 25 order suspending for 14 days, starting on March 28, the authority of Waddell & Reed Financial Inc., Overland Park, Kan., to sell securities in Missouri. Cosgrove also scheduled an April 7 hearing to review arguments about whether the company should be barred from the state.

But a state court judge in St. Louis County responded on March 29 by issuing a temporary restraining order that bars enforcement of the suspension pending an April 4 hearing. The judge moved jurisdiction over the Waddell & Reed proceedings to the Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission, away from the state Securities Division.

Waddell & Reed said on March 29 in a statement that its 450 brokers in Missouri have resumed selling financial products in the state after a brief hiatus caused by Cosgroves suspension order.

Cosgrove has been investigating Waddell & Reed because of a group of thousands of variable annuity exchanges it completed in the early 2000s.

An insurance holding company, Torchmark Inc., Birmingham, Ala., acquired Waddell & Reed and Waddell & Reeds United Investors Life Insurance Company subsidiary in the 1980s. Torchmark turned Waddell & Reed into a separate, public company in 1998, but it kept United Investors.

In 2001 and 2002, Waddell & Reed exchanged 6,700 variable annuities written by United Investors for annuities written by another company.

Officials at the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc., Washington, state securities regulators and others have argued that Waddell & Reed made the VA exchanges without determining whether the transactions were suitable for customers, but Waddell & Reed has argued that it believed the new annuities were better annuities.

Waddell & Reed says in a report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it is trying to block Cosgroves suspension order because the NASD plans to review the case at a hearing in less than a month.

“We welcome the opportunity to present evidence demonstrating the benefits achieved by the clients as a result of the transactions identified by the division, an opportunity we have not been afforded to date by the division,” the company says in the SEC filing. “We are continuing to work with the staff of the division to reach a fair and reasonable resolution.”

An NASD staff official said he could not discuss the exact Waddell & Reed hearing date because the hearing is closed.

Representatives for Cosgrove did not respond to requests for comment.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, April 1, 2005. Copyright 2005 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.



NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.