NAIC OKs Part Of Proposed Producer Fee Disclosure

By

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners achieved its stated goal of adopting a producer compensation disclosure proposal before the end of 2004, opening the door for state lawmakers to consider the newly amended producer licensing model law in the new year.

The regulators, via a conference call of the NAIC Executive Committee/Plenary session on Dec. 29, approved by a vote of 31-15 the majority of a proposed compensation disclosure amendment to the existing producer licensing model act.

However, a section of the amendment draft to which the industry strongly objected was not adopted and will be sent back to the NAIC Executive Task Force on Broker Activities for further development and will be reexamined within 90 days.

“Our commitment always has been that we would try to get something moved out by the end of the year for the benefit of those states whose legislatures only meet for a limited period of time in the calendar year,” NAIC President and Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Diane Koken said during the conference call.

One industry representative expressed his support for the adopted measures, while adding that more work still needs to be done. “We think it addresses the abuses that have been identified. And it addresses the problems that NAIC was hoping to address,” said Ron Panneton, senior counsel for the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, Falls Church, Va.

The NAIC described the new amendment as “a key component of an aggressive initiative” by state regulators to address issues regarding the producer compensation arrangements.

“This is an issue that we spent a great deal of time over the last several months debating and reviewing,” Koken told fellow regulators. “Weve made tremendous progress in developing language that addresses many of the concerns that have been identified. Its responsive to a great number of comments we received from many interested parties.”

The main section of the amendment proposal adopted by the NAIC is Section A of the draft. It proposes that a producer getting any compensation from the customer for placing insurance or representing the customer with respect to that placement, shouldnt accept any fee from an insureror other third partyfor that insurance placement unless the producer has, prior to the customers buying the insurance:

Obtained the customers documented acknowledgment that such compensation will be received by the producer or affiliate.

Disclosed the amount of compensation from the carrier or other third party for that placement. If the amount of compensation is not known at the time of disclosure, the producer should disclose the specific method for calculating such compensation and, if possible, a reasonable estimate of the amount.

The section clarifies, however, that this disclosure requirement will not apply to a producer who meets all of the following requirements:

Does not receive compensation from the customer for the insurance placement.

In connection with that insurance placement, the producer represents an insurer that has appointed the producer.

Discloses to the customer before the insurance purchase that the producer will get compensation from a carrier for that placement; or that, in connection with that placement, the producer represents the carrier and that the producer may provide services to the customer for the carrier.

The regulators also approved sections that specify how terms such as “customer,” “affiliate” and “compensation” should be defined.

In particular, the amendment points out a person shouldnt be considered a “customer” if the person is merely:

A participant or beneficiary of an employee benefit plan; or

Covered by a group or blanket insurance policy or group annuity contract sold, solicited or negotiated by the producer or affiliate.

The approved sections also stipulate that certain intermediaries, such as a managing general agent, a sales manager or a reinsurance intermediary, are excluded from disclosure requirements.

Section B, which was not approved, deals with specific disclosure issues regarding a broader class of producers. The regulators said they also will look at, among other issues, fiduciary liability issues, disclosure of all quotes received by a broker and disclosures relating to agent-owned reinsurance arrangements for possible inclusion in the section.

NAIFAs Panneton agreed with the regulators decision, noting that his association was in favor of adopting Section A and all the other portions that were adopted. He cautioned, however, that the deferred section raises some issues that will need to be worked through.

“They represent some problems at the point of sale which I dont think we all had enough time to consider,” he said. “For example, the issues of rebating that may come up. We need to make sure that we deal with them just right.”

The NAIC said it will continue its work on producer fee disclosure issues in the new year and even refine and change already adopted measures if necessary.

“These are not engraved in stone,” Koken said. “They can be changed later if we identify errors.”

is an assistant editor of NUs Property & Casualty edition.


Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, December 30, 2004. Copyright 2004 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.