SEC Chairman Jay Clayton told an auditorium filled with bankers and regulatory officials that “the amount of retail fraud that still goes on” makes him sick. “They’re not aberrations,” said Clayton, who was answering questions after giving a speech on the culture at financial institutions and the SEC.
There is currently “fertile ground for retail fraud,” and the SEC is working on that, said Clayton.
He said the agency is reaching out to long-term retail investors, not through intermediaries, but directly, asking about how they want the SEC to spend its time. About 50% of U.S. households have exposure to the securities market, said Clayton.
In his prepared speech for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York conference on governance and culture reform, Clayton said that even the agency’s role in overseeing institutional trading should be conducted in a way “that best serves the interests of long-term return investors. … Those institutions are holding and trading, in large part, the funds of retail investors. That perspective … should substantially inform how we can regulate trading.”
The retail investor is central to several SEC initiatives begun under Clayton’s leadership, which began in May 2017:
- The SEC Retail Strategy Task Force, formed last September to develop proactive, targeted initiatives to identify misconduct impacting retail investors
- SEC Cyber Unit, under the Enforcement Division, which focuses on market manipulation schemes through electronic and social media and intrusions into online retail brokerage accounts
- A Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative, whereby investment advisors could report putting put their clients into high-fee share classes when lower fee options were available in the same fund without paying a penalty other than returning the overpayments to investors.
- Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee, which focuses on disclosures of markups and markdowns of in corporate and muni debt markets, where individuals investors are key participants
- The SEC’s best-interest proposal, which would require that broker-dealers put their clients’ interest first, ahead of their own when recommending investments and strategists
The best-interest proposal, which is by far the most publicized of the lot, is more strict than the agency’s current suitability rule for investments but not as strict and the Labor Department’s fiduciary rule for retirement accounts. That rule is essentially dead since a federal appeals court threw it out and the Labor Department didn’t appeal that decision.
The SEC’s best-interest rule has been criticized because even though it would cover more than just retirement accounts, it is not as strict as the Labor rule. It does not require exemptions from certain conflicts of interest, but disclosure about “key facts” regarding potential conflicts of interest between the broker and client and it does not include the right to a private action to sue in the case of an alleged break. Perhaps most important, the SEC proposal, which is open for public comments through Aug. 7, does not specifically define what “best interest” means.
Clayton did not refer specifically to the best-interest proposal in his speech but in an example of a securities trade involving three parties — an asset manager wanting to buy to buy $10 million worth of bonds, a broker who would sell the manager those bonds from inventory and the issuer — he said that lying should not be tolerated.
In his example, the asset manager asked the broker if the bonds were available from inventory and what price the broker paid. The broker, who was offering the bonds for sale at 90 — meaning 90% of par, or in this case $9 million — said he had paid 81 when he had actually paid 80.
“The law may not prohibit all forms of lying, but your culture should reject it,” said Clayton to the audience. Firms need to ask if their controls “make it clear that lying is unacceptable and communications around markups will be monitored. And, were the offending parties dismissed or otherwise meaningfully sanctioned.
“Firms have systemic responsibility and their professions have important individual responsibility to real people that make up the investing public. … We are counting on you and more importantly, the public is counting on you to develop cultures that recognize and responsibly address these realities.”
— Check out SEC Advice Plan Requires Big Change in Broker Behavior: Clayton on ThinkAdvisor.