Close Close

Life Health > Life Insurance

NAIC Expected To Review Group Life Exclusions Issue

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

NAIC Expected To Review Group Life Exclusions Issue


Terrorism exclusions for group life products will be discussed during the spring meeting of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in Reno this week.

The issue has come up because group life carriers say that when catastrophic reinsurance is available premiums have risen anywhere from 300% to 1,400% (see NU, March 4).

Insurance executives and some commissioners are calling for the federal government to include group life products in terrorism legislation so that exclusions will be a moot point.

Edwin Harper, a Fortis, Inc. senior vice president, says the possibility of such legislation “has a pulse again. Exclusions would be a final step of self-help if we can’t get a federal backstop.”

But Harper also notes that regulators have expressed concern that it would be the wrong time for the bereaved family of an insured to learn that a claim on a group life policy was not being paid because of a terrorism exclusion.

Indeed, Georgia Commissioner John Oxendine says that a carrier would have to “jump through a lot of hurdles before I would approve one.” Oxendine says it is not in the interest of good public policy to allow such exclusions. To date, he says his department has not received any such applications.

Oxendine says it is important for Congress to address terrorism coverage because failure to do so could result in a big bill for taxpayers should another event occur. “You’re gambling. If there is not another terrorism event, then everything is fine.” But if there is another event and the population insists on help, then it would be more costly “to crank up the printing press” than to handle the issue right now, he adds.

Any applications for terrorism exclusions should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, says Michael Lovendusky, senior counsel with the American Council of Life Insurers, Washington.

Consumer advocates have questioned why private solutions such as risk pools or securitizations are not being advocated.

Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, March 18, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.

Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company. All rights reserved. Contact Webmaster


© 2023 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.