Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
People working over legal papers in a law office

Life Health > Life Insurance

Genworth Accused of Wrongly Terminating Life Policies

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The lead plaintiff in a California state court class-action lawsuit has accused Genworth’s Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Co. of terminating hundreds of life insurance policies without lawful reminders and allegedly disregarding the grace period provisions required by state law.

In a complaint filed Feb. 28, the lead plaintiff, James Fox, on behalf of a others similarly situated, alleges that Genworth has knowingly and systemically terminated life insurance policies held by customers since 2013.

The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court for the County of Sacramento, referred to California insurance law provisions that require life insurers to comply with a 60-day grace period and provide proper notice before terminating a policy for nonpayment of premiums.

“Since Jan. 1, 2013, Genworth has become aware of its failures and has failed to take the appropriate corrective action,” the complaint said. “Instead, Genworth appears to have doubled down and made the decision to ignore the law, ignore court rulings, and deal with the occasional complaint without regard to its obligation to apply these rules properly and completely to all of its varied life insurance products utilized in this state.”

The plaintiffs say they have been forced into unnecessary reinstatements, and in many instances, they have “lost all reasonable access to any insurance at all” as a result of Genworth’s actions. Plaintiffs are still allegedly paying inflated premiums and the reinstatements diminish the value of their policies, according to the complaint.

“Genworth has told numerous policy owners that they have no insurance, although their policies, unbeknownst to the policy owners, are still in force,” plaintiffs said.

The plaintiffs also claim that Genworth’s motivation was to increase the likelihood of forfeitures, allowing them to gain financially at the expense of their customers. Plaintiffs are seeking damages for their injuries and an injunction requiring ensure Genworth to comply with California insurance law.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

Counsel for the defendants were immediately unknown.

Credit: Shutterstock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.