Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Bloomberg image of worried stock trader

Technology > Investment Platforms

Investors Burned in NYSE Trading Chaos Demand Compensation

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Once the NYSE determines how much it has to cover the claims, the amount will be divided proportionally, according to sources with knowledge of the matter.
  • Industry professionals are waiting to see how much is available in the pot to cover the losses.

Investors hurt when a New York Stock Exchange malfunction sparked wild swings in stock prices are trying to recoup their losses. There’s reason to doubt they’ll get all their money back.

Losses incurred during NYSE’s system glitch last week could amount to millions of dollars, and thousands of claims have been submitted by retail brokerages including Charles Schwab Corp. and Robinhood Markets Inc., as well as market makers Virtu Financial Inc. and Citadel Securities, according to people with knowledge of the situation.

Those claims, which were submitted by a Friday deadline under NYSE rules, are likely to exceed the $500,000 that the exchange operator sets aside to cover disruptions each month, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing a private, ongoing matter. Those rules give NYSE until the end of the month — today — to evaluate the claims and decide how much to pay.

The likely losers from the Jan. 24 glitch are individual investors, who stand to recoup a fraction of their losses, if anything, under the NYSE liability rules, people familiar with the process said. Discussions are still underway and a final decision on reimbursements has yet to be made, the people said.

“Full recovery for retail investors will be somewhere between slim and none,” James Cox, a Duke University School of Law professor specializing in corporate and securities law, said in an interview. “Procedural issues are stacked against retail investors. And questions that need to be answered are stacked in favor of the NYSE.”

Spokespeople for Charles Schwab, Citadel Securities and Virtu all declined to comment.

“We are in the process of evaluating claims related to the Jan. 24 market open in accordance with our rules and will advise claimants of the outcome once our review is complete,” NYSE spokesperson Farrell Kramer said in an emailed statement.

Some trades made during the mishap have already been canceled, the exchange said last week.

“The impact of the NYSE outage was minimal given limited client exposure to the affected trades and timely risk management on part of the firm,” a Robinhood representative said in an emailed statement. “Nevertheless, this event and similar issues in the past” are arguments against a US Securities and Exchange Commission proposal requiring retail orders to be executed through exchange-run auctions.

How much is available in the pot to cover the losses is what industry professionals are waiting to find out. The ultimate decision is going to be made by an internal panel at NYSE that determines, on a case-by-case basis, what adjustments will be made, if any, for trades submitted for recovery of losses.

NYSE rules and the size of the incident cast doubt on the likelihood of the exchange paying all claims in full. Under existing laws, NYSE is allowed to set aside $500,000 each month to cover disrupted trading events. Under some circumstances, an additional $50,000 from previous months can carry over and add up over time.

With the month now ending, NYSE will have a better picture of what it’s capable of paying out to this month’s claimants.

Canceled Trades

NYSE, blaming human error, canceled thousands of trades affecting hundreds of securities, including those that fell outside parameters set to avoid large price swings, or the so-called limit up, limit down bands.

Trades that were inside the parameters under NYSE rules but still disrupted by the system malfunction weren’t considered null and void. Those investors impacted by trades inside the window have the chance to recoup losses as long as they submitted claims the deadline.

One market-making firm filed claims by Friday’s midnight deadline that had a total dollar amount exceeding $1 million, according to one person with knowledge of the matter. Another firm, which represented roughly 5% of the market flow that day, estimated the total financial impact across the market would exceed $20 million, based on its claim figures and percent participation in handling orders that morning.

Once NYSE decides how much it has to cover the claims, the amount will be divided proportionally, said the people with knowledge of the matter. There is also the potential for the exchange to seek regulatory approval to cover more of the losses, which could take additional time and resources.

NYSE has been in contact with the SEC and regulators since the mishap last week, Bloomberg News has reported.

Immediately following the incident, Charles Schwab said it was disappointed by NYSE’s handling of a technical mistake and that regulators should reconsider the risks of putting retail orders through an auction model.

“If exchanges will not accept accountability when they make an obvious mistake, it further heightens our concerns that routing even greater levels of retail orders to the exchanges will dramatically reduce the quality of the investing experience for America’s retail investors,” Charles Schwab spokesperson Mayura Hooper said in an emailed statement last week.

- With assistance from Annie Massa.

(Image: Bloomberg)

Copyright 2023 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.