Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Health Insurance > Health Insurance

Federal Judge Nominated by Obama Dismisses Maryland ‘Obamacare’ Suit

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the state of Maryland seeking a ruling that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is lawful, even after Congress repealed a tax penalty tied to it.

U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander on Friday rejected the “Obamacare” suit in a 47-page decision, although she said Maryland could bring its suit at a later time if that’s warranted.

(Related: ACA Battle Now Before a Baltimore Judge Picked by Obama)

The decision has no immediate impact on health care law.

The case had also attracted attention because Maryland sought to disqualify Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker from participating in the case.

“The effect of the court’s ruling today is simply that we must wait to pursue our case,” Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh said in a statement.

A federal court in Texas has ruled that the ACA is unconstitutional because it imposes an unconstitutional requirement on some people to have major medical insurance, through an “individual mandate” provision in the ACA that requires many people to have a minimum level of health coverage. The judge who issued that ruling suspended the effects of the ruling while the ruling is being appealed.

Hollander was appointed by former President Barack Obama, in 2010. ACA supporters had hoped she would be sympathetic to Frosh’s arguments.

Lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department had asked Hollander to throw out Frosh’s Maryland case, arguing that the state would not be harmed as long as the ACA is still being enforced.

Nicholas Bagley, a University of Michigan law professor who has been sympathetic to ACA supporters, said in December that he believed the Maryland case did appear to be premature.

The Maryland case is State of Maryland v. U.S., 18-cv-2849, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland (Baltimore). The Texas case is Texas v. U.S., 18-cv-167, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth).

— Read Texas Judge Throws Out Most of ACAon ThinkAdvisor.

— Connect with ThinkAdvisor Life/Health on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Copyright 2021 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.