Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Charges Pot Exec in Sale of Unregistered Securities on Craigslist: Enforcement

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Securities and Exchange Commission settled charges against the founder of a Maine-based medical marijuana company that solicited investors on Craigslist.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that, beginning in 2014, Richard Greenlaw raised approximately $500,000 from at least 59 investors by offering securities in 20 cannabis-related entities that he formed, which purportedly sold medical marijuana products that did not contain THC, the chemical compound responsible for most of marijuana’s psychological effects.

According to the complaint, Greenlaw sold ownership interests in the companies by posting advertisements on Craigslist. Greenlaw described the securities offering as an opportunity to be part of the new medical cannabis industry “without getting into marijuana and all of its regulations.”

When prospective investors responded to his online ads, Greenlaw followed up with securities offering documents and sales materials describing the purported marijuana products.

However, according to the SEC, Greenlaw’s offers and sales of securities were not covered by registration statements filed or in effect with the SEC.

The SEC’s settlement, which is subject to court approval, requires Greenlaw to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $340,142 and a civil penalty of $50,000.

Father Sold Firm to Son, Got Barred, Didn’t Stay Away: SEC

The SEC filed charges against a Buffalo, New York, investment advisory firm and its owner for misleading firm clients about its association with a barred investment advisor, who is also being charged for violating the bar.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that in 2014, Walter Grenda sold his investment advisory assets, including his longstanding client base, to Grenda Group LLC and his son, Gregory Grenda, in anticipation of a negative outcome in an SEC fraud investigation.

In 2015, the SEC barred Walter Grenda from association with an investment advisor, but the SEC alleges that Walter Grenda continued to associate with Grenda Group by meeting with a prospective client and current clients in the firm’s offices, as well as making discretionary changes to clients’ investment accounts.

The complaint alleges that Grenda Group and Gregory Grenda permitted Walter Grenda’s association with the firm, failed to disclose his bar to their clients, and made misleading statements to clients who inquired about Walter Grenda’s bar.

The SEC further alleges that Walter Grenda impersonated a Grenda Group client on a call to the firm’s broker-dealer and, while subject to the associational bar, Walter Grenda repeatedly impersonated his son on calls to the firm’s broker-dealer, after which the broker-dealer terminated its relationship with Grenda Group. The complaint alleges that Grenda Group and Gregory Grenda later made misleading statements to clients and failed to disclose material facts about the termination.

The SEC’s complaint seeks penalties and permanent injunctions.

Compliance Failures Lead to Firm’s Demise

Compliance deficiencies led to the demise of a private fund manager because of failures to enforce a consistent redemption policy, deliver audited financial statements, and file accurate Form ADVs.

According to the SEC, Aria Partners, which was an investment advisor to several private funds over the course of its history, failed to implement a compliance program consistent with its obligations as an RIA. This led to a failure to disclose to all investors in one of those private funds all their options to redeem their investment in the fund.

The fund’s limited partnership agreement required 90 days’ written notice for redemptions. However, Aria Partners had an informal policy, which was not disclosed to all investors in the fund, of accommodating investors’ requests to provide partial redemptions on significantly less notice than 90 days.

“These practices resulted in materially different full redemption amounts for two investors in 2015, when the fund lost value in a short period,” the SEC states.

According to the SEC, the firm also failed to deliver audited financials as required by the custody rule. The SEC also cites the firm for filing inaccurate Form ADVs, including claiming SEC registration eligibility even though the firm had less than $100 million in assets under management.

The SEC attributes the failures to the firm’s deficient compliance program which used a template manual and did not require annual compliance reviews.

As part of the SEC’s order, Aria Partners was censured and ordered to pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $150,000 to the SEC.

SEC Charges Florida Cash Advance Company, Ex-CEO With Defrauding Investors

The SEC charged 1 Global Capital LLC and its former chief executive officer for allegedly defrauding at least 3,400 retail investors, more than one-third of whom invested their retirement funds.

The Florida-based cash advance company and former CEO Carl Ruderman allegedly fraudulently raised more than $287 million since 2014 in unregistered securities sold through a network that included barred brokers, the SEC said.

According to the SEC’s complaint, investors were promised profits from 1 Global’s loans to small and midsize companies; however, a large portion of their money went to Ruderman’s lavish personal spending and to his consumer-loan companies, Bright Smile Financing and Ganador Enterprises, which had nothing to do with 1 Global’s cash advance business.

“We allege that 1 Global’s business model was a sham because instead of using investor funds as promised, 1 Global and Ruderman diverted significant funds, including to Ruderman himself for his personal benefit,” said Eric Bustillo, director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office, in a statement. “The SEC’s investigation effectively stopped 1 Global’s offering and prevented further harm to investors and retirement funds.”

Investors in 1 Global allegedly were given bogus account statements and were falsely told that it had an independent auditor, and that its secured loans, typically for small amounts, had low default rates. According to the complaint, in contrast to what it told investors, 1 Global marketed itself to business borrowers as a low-hassle way to access cash quickly, often made large, unsecured loans, and had significant problems with collections.

1 Global declared bankruptcy in July and Ruderman resigned from the company.

“The misconduct that we’ve alleged occurred in this case directly impacted retail investors,” said Stephanie Avakian, co-director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “We filed this action on an emergency basis to protect those investors from further harm.”

The SEC’s complaint seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest from the defendants and relief defendants, and financial penalties against the defendants.

The SEC also requested a temporary asset freeze against Ruderman and other Ruderman companies charged by the SEC as relief defendants.

SEC Charges New Jersey Man With Fraud in Selling Online Gaming Company Stock

The SEC announced charges against Sandy Masselli, Jr. and several associated entities — including Carlyle Gaming & Entertainment Ltd. and Carlyle Entertainment Ltd. — for perpetrating a securities fraud that enabled Masselli to misappropriate retail investor funds for his personal use.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Masselli, who was chairman and CEO of the Carlyle entities, raised approximately $3 million from investors from 2012 through 2017.

As part of the scheme, Masselli allegedly sold certain investors stock in the Carlyle entities, which were purportedly engaged in online gaming, by falsely claiming that the companies were on the verge of conducting a lucrative initial public offering and were soon to be listed on major U.S. stock exchanges. However, the SEC alleges that neither Carlyle entity had an actual plan or the capability to conduct an IPO and had not even filed applications to be listed on these exchanges.

According to the complaint, Masselli then used those investors’ money to pay personal expenses, like rent and payment of his utility bills, credit card bills and other expenses, including groceries, clothing, cosmetics, restaurants, high-end hair products, StubHub tickets, a health spa and an automobile.

BNP Paribas to Pay $90 Million Penalty to CFTC for Attempted Manipulation of Benchmark Swap Rates

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued an order filing and settling charges against BNP Paribas Securities Corp. for attempted manipulation of the ISDAFIX benchmark and requiring BNP Paribas to pay a $90 million civil monetary penalty.

The CFTC order finds that over a five-year period — beginning in or about May 2007 and continuing through at least August 2012 — BNP attempted to manipulate the U.S. Dollar International Swaps and Derivatives Association Fix (USD ISDAFIX), a leading global benchmark referenced in a range of interest rate products, to benefit its derivatives positions in instruments such as cash-settled options on interest rate swaps and certain exotic structured products.

BNP Paribas’ unlawful conduct involved multiple traders and included supervisors, according to the CFTC.

ISDAFIX rates and spreads are published daily and are meant to indicate the prevailing mid-market rate, at a specific time of day, for the fixed leg of a standard fixed-for-floating interest rate swap.

The CFTC finds that BNP, through its traders, bid, offered and executed transactions in interest rate swap spreads in a manner deliberately designed to influence the published USD ISDAFIX in order to benefit BNP Paribas in its derivatives positions.

In addition, the CFTC finds that BNP, through its employees making the bank’s USD ISDAFIX submissions, also attempted to manipulate and made false reports concerning the USD ISDAFIX by skewing the its submissions in order to benefit BNP Paribas at the expense of its derivatives counterparties and clients.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.