Traders on the floor of the NYSE. (Photo: AP)

The great migration from bonds into stocks that many market strategists have been forecasting for 2017 is equivalent to the “fake news” that spread during the presidential campaign, according to Goldman Sachs strategists.

“The political rotation occurring in Washington, D.C….[which] has prompted investors to focus on prospective tax and regulatory reforms after years of partisan gridlock … will not be mirrored in financial portfolios,” write Goldman strategists in their weekly “Kickstart” report. “Despite the sharp fall in bond values during the past six months and the prospect of further losses in 2017, we expect minimal asset rotation away from debt.”

Goldman strategists explain that many categories of investors are restricted from allocating assets away from bonds because of regulatory and policy constraints and investors that have the ability to shift assets, such as pension funds and households, are currently holding extremely low levels of debt – the lowest in 30 years.

Among those investors who face restrictions in shifting assets are the Federal Reserve, which owns $4.2 trillion worth of Treasury and agency debt but no municipal or corporate bonds, and insurance companies, which own $3.2 trillion worth of corporate bonds. The Fed is not allowed to own equities and insurance companies operate under risk-based capital guidelines that “impose a high cost to own equities,” according to the Goldman strategists.

Even mutual funds, which “may” move assets from bonds to stocks are expected to do so in a limited fashion, according to Goldman. Mutual funds, pension funds and households (a category that includes endowments, U.S. hedge funds and endowments) combined own $13 trillion worth of bonds, or roughly one-third of the $41 trillion domestic bond market.

These investors stand to lose hundreds of billions of dollars in their bond portfolios as rates rise. If the yield on the 10-year Treasury note rises to 3% by year-end, as Goldman economists are forecasting, those investors could lose approximately $500 billion in aggregate, or 4% of the value of their debt holdings, according to Goldman.

If yields increase an additional 40 basis points, with the 10-year Treasury at 3.4%, they stand to lose $850 billion in their bond holdings, representing a 6% decline in market value.

(Related: Bob Doll’s 10 Predictions for 2017)

“Despite the potential for significant value destruction in bond holdings, we expect asset rotation will be limited,” write Goldman strategists, who refer to the current low levels of debt these investors are holding. Debt accounts for 19% of holdings for households, 20% for defined benefit pension plans and just 6% for defined contribution plans.

For mutual fund portfolios the bond weighting is much higher – at 30% of total mutual fund assets, but that is in line with 5-year, 10-year and 25-year averages, according to Goldman. Mutual funds could be a source of “incremental demand for equities” as they reduce bond allocations, but the pace will be limited, write Goldman strategists. They expect mutual funds and pension funds will be net sellers of stocks in 2017 while ETFs and foreign investors are net buyers.

(Related: Bob Doll’s 10 Predictions for 2017)

Goldman strategists are forecasting a 5% total return for the S&P 500 in 2017, with the index finishing the year at 2300 after rising to 2400 during the first quarter.

They recommend overweights in financials and tech stocks and underweights in telecom, utilities, consumer staples and real estate. They are neutral on energy, industrials, materials, consumer discretionary and health care – which is also contrary to many other forecasters, who have been touting health care due to repeal or replacement of Obamacare.

In general Goldman strategists favor stocks with a 100% U.S. sales, compared to 73% for the S&P 500, noting those stocks will be insulated from currency and trade policy shifts; companies with high median effective tax rates for the past decade since they stand to benefit from U.S. tax reform; and companies with low labor costs as a percent of sales because they will be better able to withstand rising wage inflation.

— Related on ThinkAdvisor: