Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > DOL

Survey: Advisors Fear Consequences of DOL Fiduciary Rule

By The LifeHealthPro Editors

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The potential for “unlimited liability” under DOL rules is generating significant levels of anxiety among advisors, worry about being found liable for investment losses due to unintentional or unforeseeable events.

This is a key finding of a new survey from Market Strategies International unit Cogent Wealth Reports. Conducted in mid-June, the survey polled financial advisors with $25 million plus in assets under management and more than 5 years of industry experience, as well as investors with over $100,000 in investable assets.

(Related: A DOL Fiduciary Rule Compliance Checklist)

According to the report, advisors lament that the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule is “casting a negative industry glow.” While agreeing with the objectives of the DOL regulations, they fear that reputation of industry players — notably non-fiduciary advisors perceived as acting in their own interest — will be tarnished

“The DOL fiduciary ruling is fueling investors’ focus on fees,” the report states. “Investors, largely influenced by the news media, are articulating the impact of the ruling more in terms of fees rather than the more abstract concept of ‘responsibility.’”

“In turn, advisors believe DOL is forcing them into a fee-based compensation structure and limiting their product selection,” the report adds. “Despite acknowledging that this was not the stated intention of the rule, advisors generally agree that the ensuing restrictions and conversation taking place through the media have demonized the practice of charging commissions.”

Among the report’s additional findings:

  • Advisors are fiercely divided on fee structure implications. While those advisors who are already fee-based see the DOL action as formalizing an inevitable market shift, many commission-based advisors are fearful that commoditizing their service puts them at greater risk of being undercut by cheaper automated advice services.

  • Advisors’ personal liability concerns are skyrocketing due to the increased volume and scope of internal and external regulations.

  • There’s a marked increase in internal scrutiny and compliance. Advisors report feeling monitored rather than supported by their firms. In addition, the burden of compliance and required documentation is taking a toll on advisors’ ability to work efficiently, compounded by the need to document all aspects of their advisory consultations.

  • The digital world is exacerbating negative accountability while opportunities for positive advocacy remain restricted. Advisors believe that online platforms such as “broker check” are opening the door to largely unchallengeable negative reviews while avenues for positive endorsement via sites such as LinkedIn remain off-limits.

— Related on ThinkAdvisor:

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.