A 2016 major medical plan filing timeline notice from Florida shows how U.S. Supreme Court deliberations on King vs. Burwell (Case Number 14-114) could paralyze the individual markets in some states next year.
The court heard oral arguments about the case, which relates to whether Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) public exchanges established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can offer PPACA premium tax credits, March 4. The court often waits until late June to issue rulings on complicated, controversial cases.
Because about three-quarters of exchange plan enrollees are using PPACA tax credits to pay for coverage, and the exchanges now dominate many states’ individual major medical markets, a ruling against the HHS exchange tax credits could cause individual exchange plan enrollment to plummet, and increase the percentage of enrollees who have serious health problems.
Decreased access to subsidized individual coverage could also throw off actuarial projections for off-exchange plans, and even for small group plans, if loss of access to affordable individual coverage increases the percentage of workers at small employers who take up employer-sponsored coverage.
What Your Peers Are Reading
Justice Samuel Alito suggested during oral arguments that the court could stay the effects of a ruling against the HHS exchange tax credits until the end of the year, but insurers are already trying to put the finishing touches on rates for 2016.
HHS itself requires carriers in states in which CMS handles rate reviews to submit rate and form filings for 2016 individual and small-group coverage to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an arm of HHS, by May 15, 2015.