The old argument against the drinking age being 21 gets a new coat of libertarian paint. Logic has always been on the side of lowering the drinking age to 18 — the number where, in every other aspect of our lives we are adults — but a sneaky little provision (let’s call it what it is, blackmail) by the federal government bars states from lowering the age. Currently, the long arm of the government is getting too long and casting too big of a shadow over peoples’ lives for a large segment of the population. So, why doesn’t some politician curry favor with the 18-25 demographic and make this their cause?
Many clients have little or no protection for their ability to earn a paycheck.
Most of the rest of the country looks good. But what happened to Idaho?
A marketing veteran takes on… the question.
Sponsored by NGL
Help your clients plan for their future now so final expenses don’t overwhelm their loved ones later.
Don’t miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed investment advisory decisions. Join ThinkAdvisor.com now!
- Free unlimited access to ThinkAdvisor.com which provides advisors, like you, with comprehensive coverage of the products, services and trends necessary to guide your clients in making critical wealth, health and life decisions.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM and ThinkAdvisor events.
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.
Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.