WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney says he has a plan to help people with pre-existing medical conditions get health insurance. But there’s a huge catch: You basically have to be covered in the first place.
If you had a significant break in health insurance coverage an insurer still could delve into your medical history, looking for anything — from a bad back to high blood pressure — that could foreshadow future claims. They’d be able to turn you down.
That’s a contrast to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which guarantees that people in poor health can get comprehensive coverage at the same rates everybody else pays, and provides government subsidies to help low- to middle-income households pay premiums.
Starting Jan. 1, 2014, an insurer “may not impose any pre-existing condition exclusion,” the law says.
Romney mentioned his pre-existing conditions plan during last week’s presidential debate. “I do have a plan that deals with people with pre-existing conditions,” he said.
His campaign has not spelled out details other than it would help people who have maintained continuous coverage. That involves making incremental changes to insurance laws and regulations, and may or may not whittle down the number of uninsured.
“It will solve some of the problems,” said health economist Gail Wilensky, a longtime adviser to Republicans. “It won’t solve the problem of people having gone for a long time without health insurance.”
Since losing health insurance is often connected to major life upheavals like job loss or divorce, many people aren’t able to keep up continuous coverage. More than 70 percent of the uninsured have been without coverage for a year or longer, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Obama’s answer — it’s the law of the land unless repealed — is more like hitting the reset button. About 30 million uninsured people would gain coverage as the U.S. moves closer to other economically advanced countries that provide health care for all citizens.
The differences between the Obama and Romney approaches reflect a fundamental disagreement about the role of government in dealing with the nation’s health care woes: high costs, uneven quality, widespread waste and nearly 49 million uninsured.
Republicans are looking for private-sector solutions that government can encourage. Under Obama, government has taken the wheel, framing a grand bargain in which insurance companies will have to accept all applicants in exchange for a requirement that virtually all Americans carry coverage.