Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
November 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM
A judge on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims this week declined a request from the U.S. Justice Department to pause a health insurer’s suit that seeks more than $208 million in payments from the Affordable Care Act risk corridors program.
The government urged the court to freeze Moda Health Plan Inc.’s case to allow a federal appeals court to rule in a suit that presents similar issues. In that case, Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Co. is fighting in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to revive its claim that the program owes the nonprofit carrier $75 million.
Related: Federal Claims Court rejects insurer’s ACA risk corridors suit
Moda Health is based in Portland, Oregon. Land of Lincoln was based in Chicago.
The Land of Lincoln and Moda Health cases are among several in which the plaintiffs contend that the government is on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in ACA risk corridors program payments.
The ACA risk corridors program was supposed to help minimize the financial risk insurers faced when participating in the ACA health insurance exchanges. Program managers were supposed to use cash from thriving exchange plan issuers to help struggling issuers. Managers collected only enough cash from thriving issuers to pay about 13 percent of the program obligations for 2014, and managers have said they expect to use any cash they collect from the program for 2015 to meet the 2014 obligations.
Judge Thomas Wheeler of the Federal Claims Court ruled for Moda Health on Monday and refused to temporarily stay proceedings. The government, Wheeler said, failed to prove a “pressing need” to temporarily stop the action. Wheeler acknowledged Land of Lincoln’s pending appeal, but he said the Federal Circuit will benefit from having more than one ruling in the lower court.
“[O]ne of the main functions of an appellate court is to consider the various viewpoints of the lower courts,” Wheeler wrote in his ruling. “It logically follows that lower courts must be free to consider similar facts and reach independent conclusions — otherwise, there would be no need for an appellate court to harmonize the law within a circuit.”
In Land of Lincoln’s case, Charles Lettow, a Federal Claims judge, dismissed the nonprofit’s case this month. Lettow concluded that the health care exchange’s issuer-agreements, which describe how the ACA risk-corridor payments work, are not, in fact, binding contracts.
