Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Portfolio > Mutual Funds

Firm to Pay $503K to SEC for Misleading on Mutual Funds

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A New York-based investment advisory firm agreed to pay $503,228 to settle charges that it misled investors about the performance of its Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMMX), a registered open-end investment company, and caused the overvaluation of certain of the fund’s securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission said Tuesday.

RIA Semper Capital Management didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday, one day after the SEC issued an order saying the firm submitted an offer of settlement in the case.

Without admitting or denying the findings in the SEC’s order, Semper agreed to a cease-and-desist order, a censure and to pay disgorgement of fees totaling $103,228, plus interest of $25,000 and a $375,000 penalty, the SEC said.

Semper caused the overvaluation of smaller-sized bond positions known as “odd lots” bought by SEMMX, from the fund’s launch in July 2013 until May 2014, the SEC claimed. That “overvaluation of odd lot positions was responsible for a substantial portion of SEMMX’s performance during this period and resulted in the overstating of SEMMX’s net asset value,” according to the SEC.

The SEC’s order also found that in SEMMX’s 2013 and 2014 annual reports to investors, Semper didn’t disclose that SEMMX’s investment performance had been materially improved by the overvaluation of odd lot bond positions. “Instead, Semper misleadingly attributed the performance to, among other things, Semper’s purchase of non-agency mortgage backed securities that rose towards fundamental values during the periods in question,” the SEC said.

Semper also “failed to adopt policies and procedures that were reasonably designed to address Semper’s public disclosures concerning the attribution of SEMMX’s reported performance,” the SEC order said.

The SEC’s order alleged that Semper willfully violated Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and that Semper caused SEMMX’s uncharged violation of Rule 22c-1.

Semper, which has about $3 billion in assets under management, has been registered with the SEC as an investment advisor since 1992, according to the SEC.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.