Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Retirement Planning > Social Security

EBSA Lets ERISA Fiduciaries Settle Suits

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

NU Online News Service, Dec. 31, 2003, 6:59 p.m. EST – The Employee Benefits Security Administration says benefit plan fiduciaries can settle class-action lawsuits and other suits involving interested parties without necessarily triggering the penalties imposed on “prohibited transactions.”[@@]

The EBSA, an arm of the U.S. Department of Labor, has published a final class exemption that spells out the rules that plan fiduciaries must follow when settling litigation with sponsors, service providers, participants and other interested parties.

The ruling affects financial services firms and other entities that act as fiduciaries for benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

ERISA prohibits fiduciaries from letting plans under their supervision extend credit, sell property or lease property to interested parties. ERISA also prohibits fiduciaries from letting plans transfer assets to interested parties, except when the plan is conducting routine administrative activities, such as making retirement benefit payments.

The EBSA announced in February that it was looking at the issue because many fiduciaries have asked it about the rules for settling class-action securities fraud cases that involve interested parties.

Sometimes “the plan and/or its participants are shareholders,” according to an analysis written by Ivan Strasfeld, director of the EBSA Office of Exemption Determinations, that appeared in February. “In many securities fraud cases, the plan may also have a cause of action against some of the same parties, based on ERISA violations. The defendants in the ERISA case are likely to overlap with the defendants in the securities fraud litigation.”

Because plan fiduciaries are handling so many cases, the Labor Department wants to make sure fiduciaries have a mechanism for settling cases when doing so clearly will benefit plan participants and beneficiaries, Strasfeld wrote.

The final version of the class exemption provides an exemption for fiduciaries for plans that have settled or will settle court-certified class-action suits, or other cases involving a “genuine controversy,” before Jan. 30, 2004. To qualify for the exemption, fiduciaries must be able to show that plans have negotiated reasonable settlements that reflect the plans’ likelihood of full recovery, the risks and costs of litigation and the value of claims foregone.

Fiduciaries of plans that extend credit to interested parties, such as employers accused of securities fraud, must show that the plans have taken into account the creditworthiness of the interested parties and the time value of money when setting the credit terms.

Fiduciaries of plans that settle cases after Jan. 30, 2004, can resolve the cases before judges certify class-action status by convincing independent legal advisors that the cases involve genuine controversy, according to the final version of the class exemption.

In most cases, employers and other interested parties must pay settlements using cash or marketable securities.

Parties can make noncash settlement payments if necessary to rescind a transaction that is the subject of litigation, according to the exemption.

Strasfeld says the final version of the exemption gives different “genuine controversy” standards for old settlements and new settlements because some members of the public complained that, in the past, lawyers for fiduciaries would not have bothered to give opinions about whether ERISA plan cases involved genuine controversies.

The final version also leaves out a proposed requirement that plans charge interested parties involved in settlements a specific interest rate. Several public commenters pointed out that many settlement agreements specify payment periods without bothering to specify interest rates, Strasfeld says.

More information about the class exemption is on the Web at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-32191.htm

The EBSA published an earlier notice discussing the class exemption at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-3393.htm


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.