Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
October 01, 2008 at 04:00 AM
Variable annuities have undergone and are still undergoing constant improvement, experts say, and a more advisors than before are willing to consider them for clients.
Research recently asked John McCarthy and Kevin Loffredi of Advanced Sales Corporation (www.advsales.com), publishers of the Annuity Intelligence Report, for their thoughts on the VA marketplace.
What are some recent trends?
Loffredi: The most dramatic is having the lifetime withdrawal benefits, and in particular, having the benefit based on two lives — a spousal lifetime guaranteed withdrawal benefit. We have also seen age-banding of these benefits where the withdrawal percentage is not fixed when you buy the contract. The rate usually depends on the age at which the first withdrawal occurs, so the older you are when you take that first withdrawal, the higher the payout percentage.
It just seems like every week, the carriers are trying to one-up each other in terms of how the withdrawal percentage is calculated, or how the benefit base, which is ultimately what the withdrawal percentage is calculated against, increases.
Additionally, companies are adding provisions to the withdrawal benefits that double the withdrawal benefit if the annuitant goes into a nursing home. Companies like Lincoln and Prudential and Protective have benefits that if you are confined to a nursing home, instead of receiving five percent while you are in the nursing home, they will pay you ten percent. Prudential takes it one step further and says that if you cannot perform two out of seven activities of daily living (ADLs), they will double the percentage, subject to an exclusionary period.
What about the risk that issuing insurers could have trouble paying for these benefits?
McCarthy: Professor Moshe Milevsky of York University has said that he thinks some of these benefits may be underpriced. We’ve gone from a position where traditional variable annuities sometimes get a bad rap for setting fees that are too high to a point where some of these living benefits may be underpriced if they become hot sellers.
