Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > FINRA

FINRA Seeks Comments on Corporate Bond Block Trades, Deposit Accounts

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority is accepting comments on a pair of regulatory notices, one a proposed pilot program for a 48-hour delay to price reporting of corporate bond block trade reporting and another that could require a small number of member firms to keep a cushion of cash or securities for the protection of investors.

The latter, Regulatory Notice 19-17, would require a restricted firm to set up a deposit account of cash and/or qualified securities of a certain amount. These funds could be used to cover future arbitration awards and couldn’t be withdrawn without FINRA’s prior written consent.

These firms subject to the proposed rules are expected to be few based on certain preliminary metrics, such as having an unusually high number of disclosure events or a history of hiring brokers with checkered disciplinary records.

Although comments are due July 1, the proposed Restricted Firm Obligations rule already has at least one commenter unhappy with the concept.

“FINRA has a lot of nerve pre‐judging future behavior and demanding funds for itself,” wrote Dan Pisenti of San Francisco’s Whitehall‐Parker Securities. “FINRA wants to profile firms and use this crystal ball to force firms to set up prepaid accounts to cover FINRA’s future shakedown interests…Many firms do not have large amounts of cash available to be held as restricted deposits.”

Separately, Regulatory Notice 19-12, the proposed corporate bond block trade pilot, is designed to look at a couple of recommendations by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee.

The pilot would delay any release of information on these big trades for 48 hours and raise the caps for the release of information on the block trade amounts.

Comments are due June 11 for the pilot program, but smaller investment funds have already weighed in with concerns about how the program, if implemented, would be unfair to them, forfeit transparency for many market players and only serve to advantage bigger entities.

Larger institutional investors and broker-dealers “are undoubtedly advantaged by this increased information asymmetry, resulting in wider bid‐ask trading spreads the cost of which will be disproportionately borne by smaller institutional investors,” wrote Gregory Simcik, credit analyst with the New York City-based The Pension Boards United Church of Christ.

These proposed reporting changes “might encourage more big block trades, allowing for market ‘depth’ but the increased tiering of institutional investors will further disadvantage smaller institutional investors that are an important component of trading market ‘breadth,’” Simcik wrote in his comment letter.

Additionally, the chief investment officer for the San Bernardino County government’s $7 billion fixed income pool told FINRA that its proposal would actually end up reducing liquidity by reducing transparency in the market. Traders would start using other sources of information, creating “confusion about underlying prices and increase volatility,” wrote Parth Bhatt, the chief investment officer. “The current trace rules are invaluable to government entities like us. They do not give anyone undue advantage and result in fair and equal distribution of trade information.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.