Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Industry Spotlight > RIAs

There’s a New ‘Best’ Size for Optimal Growth

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

It’s a given that registered investment advisors must have “scale” to grow. But how much scale (aka size) is needed to deliver the highest level of value to clients and produce strong returns for RIA owners and team members?

The latest research from Dynasty Financial Partners and Advisor Growth Strategies highlights data that differ from figures often cited by industry consultants, which may surprise some RIAs.

“Based on the results of our analysis, it became clear that optimum scale for RIAs is greater than the $1 billion to $2 billion assets … size that is industry conventional wisdom,” stated Dynasty Chairman Todd Thomson and Advisor Growth Strategies Principal John Furey in the report.

The research compared the results of firms affiliated with Dynasty to several other industry benchmarks, and it looked at the benefits of working on a shared platform. The analysis finds that Dynasty member firms gain substantial scale via the firm’s expertise and negotiating power with technology and custodial providers. Plus, those in its RIA cohort are more profitable than firms operating on a stand-alone basis and grow at a faster pace.

Metrics Matter The research argues that due to the disparity in business structures across the RIA industry, earnings before owner compensation (or EBOC) is not the most “meaningful measure for larger, more professional RIA firms.” Plus, earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT, “does not tend to work for smaller, owner-operated firms.”

Thus, the research developed and examined a new margin performance benchmark: EBAC, for earnings before owner and advisor compensation.

“EBAC allows for an apples-to-apples comparison for the true margin of RIAs before paying advisors and owners, and thus offers a meaningful comparison of margin across all sizes and types of RIA firms, regardless of how they structure their ownership,” the authors explained. In their analysis, firms sharing a platform report EBAC of 62% of average revenue on average vs. industry benchmarks of 56–58% EBAC.

“The Shared Platform Cohort pays more for their state-of-the-art platform and consulting services, but these higher costs are outweighed by far lower personnel costs and other expenses,” according to Dynasty/AGS.

AGS looked at 19 RIAs with between $300 million and $2 billion in assets under administration. The 15 Dynasty firms using the shared platform RIAs ranged from $200 million in AUA to over $4.1 billion.

Dynasty says that it can provide members with the scale of a business with over $30 billion in AUA, though its largest group included in the study had under $5 billion.

“A fundamental hypothesis in our industry is a well-managed RIA will expand margins as they grow. The results demonstrate that individual firm scale remains important even within the context of a shared platform model,” the authors said.

RIA owners, they add, tend to “overestimate their relative scale, underestimate the impact of the direct cost of employees, underestimate the difficulty and time required to hire and manage non-advisory employees effectively, and over-emphasize the relative cost of technology and outsourcing solutions.”

Looking at the potential impact on relative valuation for firms, the researchers calculated cash flow to the buyer or EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), assuming a 35% advisor payout. For stand-alone AGS firms it was 21% versus 27% for firms on a shared platform.

Looking in detail at one firm, the researchers concluded that its pre-shared platform EBAC averaged 64% versus the shared platform average of 66%. When it joined the platform, though, the firm’s revenue growth jumped from an average of 9% per year to 18%. The authors highlighted these implications:

1. Outsourcing and shared services should predominate in the RIA industry, especially in areas that are not central to the core value proposition. 2. The most profitable and fastest-growing RIAs will be the outsized winners during expected consolidation. 3. Even RIAs that don’t plan to grow nationwide can benefit from leveraging shared services.

Janet Levaux is editor-in-chief of Investment Advisor and Research on Wealth. She can be reached at [email protected].


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.