Sen. Warren Probes Robinhood CEO on Trading Restrictions
Warren wants to know whether hedge funds or other firms like Citadel influenced Robinhood's decision to restrict trades.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., probed Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev on Tuesday as to why the brokerage firm “abruptly changed the rules” for retail investors by restricting trades and imposing other limits during the frenzy in GameStop and other heavily shorted stocks.
In a letter sent Tuesday, Warren told Tenev that Robinhood abruptly changed the rules for individual investors “with no warning or recourse while hedge funds and other wealthy Wall Street institutions continued to trade.”
Said Warren: “In addition to putting customers’ finances at risk, Robinhood’s actions revealed a new set of questions about its relationship with large hedge funds and other financial institutions, and follows past criticisms of Robinhood’s insufficient investor protections,” Warren wrote.
Robinhood, she said, “has a responsibility to treat its investors honestly and fairly, and provide them with access to the market under a transparent and consistent set of rules. It is deeply troubling that the company may not be doing so.”
Warren asked Tenev to “disclose the circumstances behind Robinhood’s decision to restrict trading, including any influence its hedge fund investors or other financial services partners like [market maker] Citadel with significant stakes in these trades, may have had on Robinhood’s decision making.”
In a blog post on Friday, Robinhood stated that it “limited buying in volatile securities to ensure it complied with deposit regulations,” not because it wanted to stop investors from buying certain stocks.
The amount required by clearinghouses “to cover the settlement period of some securities rose tremendously” during the week of Jan. 25. “How much/? To put it in perspective, this week alone, our clearinghouse-mandated deposit requirements related to equities increased ten-fold. And that’s what led us to put temporary buying restrictions in place on a small number of securities that the clearinghouses had raised their deposit requirements on.”
Mandatory Arbitration
Warren says she’s also troubled by Robinhood’s “inclusion of forced arbitration clauses in its customer agreement, which suggests that investors will not have sufficient opportunity to pursue their claims and seek relief.”
Citing reports, Warren stated that at least 18 lawsuits have been filed against Robinhood in the last week, with some “’seek[ing] damages on behalf of other aggrieved investors.’”
Stated Warren: “Secretive arbitration processes deny customers a fair hearing, undermine public accountability, and hamper efforts to assemble a thorough and complete understanding of events.”
Warren also cited Robinhood’s regulatory woes, including a complaint by Massachusetts’ top securities regulator William Galvin in December for acting “without regard for the best interest of its customers,” as well as Robinhood paying $65 million to settle charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission for “misleading customers about revenue sources and failing to satisfy duty of best execution.”
Warren asked Tenev to answer a bevy of question by Feb. 9, including why Robinhood restricted “transactions for certain securities to position closing only” on Jan. 28 as well as the terms of the arbitration processes that Robinhood customers are required to participate in when seeking relief.
— Check out How Ace Stock Picker John Buckingham Reacted to GameStop Squeeze on ThinkAdvisor.