Yes.
However, if dividends are applied to reduce current premiums, only the net premium must be included in the employee’s taxable income.
The premium payments are generally treated as additional compensation paid to the employee and are, therefore, deductible by the employer. However, if the employer is a closely-held corporation and the employee a stockholder, the IRS may challenge the arrangement on the grounds that the premiums are disguised dividends taxable to the insured, but not deductible by the corporation (
see Q
8765).
Even where an insured employee and owner of the corporation was not the owner of the policy, but the employee’s child or spouse was owner and beneficiary, payment of premiums on the policy was found to confer an economic benefit to the employee and, as such, was includable in the employee’s gross income.
3 Where a stockholder-employee argued that premiums paid by the corporation on the employee’s personal insurance were merely loans, the premiums were treated as taxable dividends. This will be the result unless the employee can produce evidence to show that the employee intended to reimburse the corporation for the premium payments.
4
1. Treas. Reg. § 1.61-2(d)(2)(ii)(A);
Canaday v. Guitteau, 86 F.2d 303 (6th Cir. 1936);
Yuengling v. Commissioner, 69 F.2d 971 (3rd Cir. 1934).
2.
Weeks v. Commissioner, 16 TC 248 (1951);
Sturgis v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1951, 10 TCM (CCH) 136.
3.
Brock v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1982-335;
Champion Trophy Mfg. Corp. v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1972-250;
see IRC § 301(c).
4.
Schwartz v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1963-340;
Jameson v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1942.