Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > ETFs > Broad Market

SEC Wants Pre-Trade Prices Made Public

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Securities and Exchange Commission wants to require the public distribution of pre-trade pricing information in the fixed income markets.

“This potentially transformative change would broaden access to pricing information that today is available only to select parties,” said SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White.

White discussed this regulatory initiative during remarks to The Economic Club of New York on Friday afternoon.

This initiative, which White said was referenced in the commission’s 2012 Report on the Municipal Securities Market, would require the public dissemination of the best prices generated by alternative trading systems and other electronic dealer networks in the corporate and municipal bond markets. 

“[W]e must be mindful to strike the right balance of compelling the disclosure of meaningful pre-trade pricing information without discouraging market participants from producing it because of concerns that it will compromise trading positions,” she told the audience gathered at the New York Marriott Marquis Times Square. 

The SEC plans to engage in thorough discussions with market participants and analyze the pricing data already available to assess how best to achieve their regulatory objectives.

“Properly implemented, rules providing for better pre-trade pricing transparency have the potential to transform the fixed income markets by promoting price competition, improving market efficiency, and facilitating best execution,” White said.

White also addressed the conflict of interest between investors and intermediaries, asking for more transparency. Conflicts often arise when exchanges and dealers act together to control competition among dealers in setting their prices.

“[I]ntermediation – when it is unnecessary, inefficient, or uncompetitive – can also unnecessarily increase the costs to investors,” White said. “The explicit fees charged by exchanges and brokers, for example, may be excessive in the absence of effective competition.  Serious concerns have also been raised about excessive intermediation by dealers.”

White said problems can also arise when dealers insert themselves between buyers and sellers when they are not really needed. She added this often happens with actively traded products where there are usually a large number of investors seeking to trade. 

A lack of transparency in a dealer’s profits and costs can also create problems because they’re trading at prices that are not determined by effective competition.

Given that a great many securities products are not actively traded, dealers continue to play a critical role in our markets,” White said. “An important challenge for the SEC has long been how to ensure that dealers have the economic incentives to continue to play this role while avoiding undue costs for investors from excessive intermediation.”

Check out House Committee OKs Smaller SEC Budget Raise Than Hoped For on ThinkAdvisor.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.