Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

‘Triumphs’ of the Regulators

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The magnificent and multiple failures of financial regulators over the past few years have been rather alarming. From Ponzi schemes to massive brokerage implosions, we’re no longer surprised by the multibillion dollar meltdowns; we’re just surprised that it keeps happening under the careful watch of financial regulators.

Pessimists say regulators have had so many big misses that they might as well not have existed. But this is a shortsighted view. It also fails to appreciate that creating a bureaucratic dynasty takes careful planning.

In recent years, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s pinnacle of regulatory success is illustrated by its “big” catches:

Exhibit A: The crucifixion of Martha Stewart has the SEC’s trademark stamped everywhere. She was convicted of lying to investigators about a stock sale that involved purposely avoiding $45,673 in market losses. Stewart served five months in prison, with limited access to flowers and baking pans. Because of her imprisonment, the SEC almost single-handedly starved our nation. How many cookie snacks were missed during Stewart’s detention? I’m glad to report most Americans have gained back all the pounds they lost.

Exhibit B: Allen Stanford is another outstanding example of “big” catches. He was allowed to become a billionaire after many years of being secretively watched but never caught. All fingers point directly to the SEC’s faulty license revocation policy. While the agency has revoked plenty of series 6s, 7s, and 24s, it has yet to revoke anybody’s license to steal. To salute his financial acumen, Antigua and Barbuda knighted Stanford as an official “Sir.” But in Texas, where he grew up, he’s still known as “cattywompus.”

Exhibit C: A final case study is none other than Bernard Madoff, whose multibillion dollar investment scam to this day continues to awe crooks (and capitalists) throughout the world. According to some accounts, he became a millionaire by the age of 29 but only because he was a thief by the age of 16. The SEC, technically speaking, cannot count Madoff as a “big” catch, because they never caught him. He was ratted out by his sons. As a result, Madoff was found guilty and sentenced to 150 years behind bars, which is a pretty good deal. Did you know that in the Republic of Congo — for similar sins and offenses — they rope you to a tree and come back for you in three months?

For whatever it’s worth, here is the general order of all securities rulemaking: Previous rules are replaced with new rules, which eventually get replaced with the previous rules. Meanwhile, as a team of government lawyers continually adds to the cesspool of existing rules, an even larger team of lawyers working for Wall Street exploits the loopholes like a hot knife slicing through butter. And whatever loopholes they miss, lobbyists have already begun to tackle. Ultimately, innovative rules lead to innovative rule-skirting.

For the quantitative-oriented minds that still don’t understand this concept, here are the equations:

Old Rules (x) + New Regulation (y) = More Rules10 (z)

More Rules10 (z) + Future Rules (?) = More Rules and Laws100

More Rules and Laws100 = More Loopholes1000

Mathematical equations aside, we are still left with a juicy question: Do more rules create better regulation?

To a greater extent, I think today’s police work has become a modern day replica of the Spanish Inquisition. In some cases it appears the SEC has completely shifted its attention away from regulating to revenge. Someday all of this may eventually lead to one worldwide regulator that combines Interpol, the CIA, FINRA, SEC, and SWAT into one united offense against anyone wearing a Brooks Brothers suit.

From what I gather, most of Wall Street’s criminals have already been barred from the securities business, or they’ve graduated to bigger things, like how to run the world. The rest of their time is spent sheltering their billions in private offshore charities. Thankfully they are no longer the SEC’s concern because they now fall under the dual jurisdiction of the IRS and Coast Guard.

For the public good, I would like to see the SEC simplify its charter and aim for more achievable milestones. How about this one: “We won’t make things worse.” Now there’s a bona fide mission statement, and it even has a nice ring to it. •

This commentary was adapted from Ron DeLegge’s new book Gents with No Cents: A Closer Look at Wall Street, its Customers, Financial Regulators and the Media (Half Full Publishing, 2011).


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.