Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Richard Miller

Financial Planning > Trusts and Estates

4 Things Advisors Must Know About Beneficiary Designations

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Advisors who think a will controls the disposition of all assets at death are making a big mistake.
  • Probate assets, owned in the decedent's name, are passed through the will; other assets may go directly to the named beneficiaries.
  • Advisors and BDs must take care to ensure that e-signatures are genuine.

Many people believe that a will controls the disposition of all of one’s assets at death. This is not so. 

For entities that serve as asset custodians, such as banks, brokerage houses and insurance companies, it’s crucial to understand the difference between probate and non-probate assets — and the role that beneficiary designations play in how assets pass at death. 

  • Probate assets are owned solely in the decedent’s name and are controlled and distributed according to the terms of the will. These assets must go through the surrogate’s court process for supervision, approval and distribution. 
  • Non-probate assets are those that pass outside the will. They bypass the court process and go directly to beneficiaries. Examples of non-probate assets are those held with joint tenancy, property held in a trust, retirement accounts with named beneficiaries and life insurance proceeds to a designated beneficiary who is not the decedent or the decedent’s estate.

Beneficiary designations have significant legal implications, for both the individual completing the designation forms and the financial advisor. As a result, it is imperative that individuals receive independent and professional advice from an estate planning attorney, and that financial institutions take steps to make sure that intended beneficiaries are designated and updated correctly. 

Here are four considerations around beneficiary designations to help advisors ensure authentication.

1. Proper titling of assets is crucial.

A will controls assets in an individual’s name but not those with joint owners or controlled by beneficiary designation. Joint accounts and beneficiary designations supersede the will and often pass directly to the surviving joint owner or beneficiary even if the will directs otherwise. 

For example, testamentary trusts are generally established so assets do not pass outright to such beneficiaries as minors, those receiving government benefits, spouses with children from a prior relationship and mentally incapacitated individuals. Therefore, to ensure that assets are distributed to the testamentary trust or as intended under the will, the advisor must identify how the accounts are titled and how the account will pass at death. 

2. Be aware of default beneficiaries.

It is common for individuals to name their spouse or children as beneficiaries of a life insurance policy. As with the testamentary trust example, under the governing instrument, a policy might default to a spouse or children if a contingent beneficiary is not named. This could circumvent the will’s provisions and cause assets to pass to an unintended recipient.

3. Blended families need special planning.

Blended families have a higher risk of estate disputes and litigation, underscoring the issues associated with beneficiary designations. If one or both partners in a second marriage have children from a prior relationship, an individual’s will typically establishes a lifetime trust for the surviving spouse. At the death of the surviving spouse, the remaining trust assets would revert to the children of the first decedent.

However, conflicts can arise if the surviving spouse is the designated beneficiary of the first decedent’s life insurance policy or individual retirement account because the death benefit would be paid outright to the surviving spouse or the surviving spouse would inherit the IRA, potentially excluding the first decedent’s children from receiving the assets.

Further, disgruntled heirs may attempt to set aside beneficiary designations with allegations of undue influence and lack of capacity. Lawsuits can also be brought against the financial institution and advisor involved in the beneficiary designation process.

4. Identity risks must be managed.

Technology is changing the way that advisors communicate with clients. Personal communications will continue to diminish as technology evolves around how legal documents are handled (think DocuSign and other electronic means of executing documents). This creates more opportunities for fraud and exploitation; older adults are especially vulnerable to scams. Financial institutions have a duty to minimize these risks.

For example, institutions should assess their existing protocols to ensure that the account owner is the one actually completing or submitting the document. 

Before processing the beneficiary designation forms, use multi-verification and authentication methods to confirm that the owner of the policy or account is the one submitting the form, understands its implications and has been advised to seek independent legal counsel before submitting the form. A good practice to implement this is to require follow-up calls to the account owner to validate the document. 

These efforts mitigate the risk of lawsuits against brokers, advisors, agents and companies that manage non-probate assets such as retirement accounts, annuities, life insurance policies and transfer on death accounts. The additional work and responsibility are worth it.

Conclusion

While advisors cannot completely eliminate exposure, understanding the significance of beneficiary designations as they relate to a client’s global estate plan is an essential first step. Doing so will inform the policies and procedures that a firm should consider implementing to ensure that the client’s testamentary intent is memorialized and effectuated regarding the disposition of non-probate assets. 

Therefore, financial institutions are encouraged to evaluate their existing policies and procedures that involve beneficiary designations so they can take the action necessary to put best practices in place and ensure that advisors are following them to reduce exposure to unintentional liability.    


Richard Miller is a partner in the Trusts and Estates practice at Mandelbaum Barrett PC, in Roseland, New Jersey.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.