Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > Mutual Funds > Equity Funds

Target-Date Results Falling Behind

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The second quarter wasn’t kind to the markets or target-date funds, according to Ibbotson Associates. However, both equity and fixed-income markets had decent 12-month performance results, based on June 30 data, though target-date funds have not kept pace, says the research group, which is part of Morningstar.

“Non-U.S. equity was the biggest drag on target-maturity performance” in the March-to-June period, according to Jeremy Stempien and Cindy Galiano, both directors of investments for the organization and authors of a second-quarter update on target-date funds released in late July.

In the first quarter of 2012, target-date funds had average returns of 9%. But during the second quarter, Ibbotson reports, the average loss for target-maturity funds was 2.8%, nearly identical to the performance of the S&P 500 Index and almost 5 percentage points lower than the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. “The poor performance was driven by the dismal performance of non-U.S. equities, which lost almost 7%,” the authors explain.

Plus, the 12-month performance dropped into negative territory, with the average target maturity fund losing 0.5%. Again, this was “driven by the underperformance of non-U.S. equities,” which lost more than 13% over the period. Over the past 12 months, the S&P 500 improved 5.5% and the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ticked up 7.5%.

Still, assets kept moving into target-date funds, which benefit from auto-enrollment and auto-escalation features associated with many corporate and other retirement plans. As of June 30, assets in target-maturity funds totaled $431 billion. The “big three,” Fidelity, Vanguard and T. Rowe Price, continue to garner most flows, and captured close to 75% of net flows during the second quarter.

“We typically have observed the average target-maturity performance fall between that of the S&P 500 and the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, as the funds are made up of a mix of equities and fixed income,” note Stempien and Galiano. “But over the past quarter and 12-month period, the returns of target-maturity funds have been lower due to non-U.S. equity exposure.”

Asset Classes

Non-U.S. equity markets were the worst-performing equity asset class in Q2, the Ibbotson researchers say. The highly volatile asset class had an 8.8% decline, while developed non-U.S. equity had a 6.9% drop.

Within U.S.-based equity assets, the recent trend of growth outperforming value continued, as did the superiority of large-cap equity over small caps. “Alternatives such as commodities also struggled during the quarter declining 4.6%,” the performance report explains.

“The bright spot was U.S. REITs, which was the sole equity asset class to turn in positive performance. It not only was positive, but had a strong 4.0% return rewarding those target maturity funds that allocated significant assets relative to peers,” the authors share.

Also in the second quarter, all fixed-income asset classes ended the quarter with positive returns. Those with longer duration, such as TIPs and U.S. aggregate bonds, had the best performance vs. U.S. short-term bonds and cash. High-yield bonds, which exhibit a much higher correlation with equities than other fixed-income asset classes, improved 1.8% during the period.

Results for the past 12 months generally reflected the Q2 trends. (See chart).


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.