Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

BREAKING NEWS: US Court of Appeals spots holes in 151A

By Daniel Williams

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The path for SEC 151A took a detour today when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit made a decision regarding the controversial ruling.

“Having determined that the SEC’s analysis is lacking, we conclude that this matter should be remanded to the SEC to address the deficiencies with its analysis,” wrote the three-judge panel.

The rule, which would securitize annuities, and was adopted in the final stages of the Bush administration, has been a lightning-rod within the insurance industry. Grassroots organizations have sprung up to combat 151A and Congressmen in both the House and Senate have drafted legislation to overturn it.

But this declaration by the D.C. Circuit was the first real blow delivered to the ruling, which, if implemented, would take effect Jan. 12, 2011.

“We hold that the Commission’s consideration of the effect of Rule 151A on efficiency, competition, and capital formation was arbitrary and capricious,” the court wrote in its decision. “The SEC purports to have analyzed the effect of the rule on competition, but does not disclose a reasoned basis for its conclusion that Rule 151A would increase competition.”

All this does not mean 151A is over or that indexed annuities could not still be securitized; merely that the SEC has more work in front of it to get 151A implemented.

And, the court stated that although the SEC failed to fully analyze the impact of 151A, its federal regulation would be superior to a smattering of state laws.

As the court wrote in its conclusion – “After a more thorough review of the existing state law regime, the Commission may decide ultimately that Rule 151A will promote competition, efficiency, and capital formation.”

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.