Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Image of a gavel on an open book and the words Fiduciary Rule, along with the logo of the US Dept. of Labor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > DOL

New Court Filing Seeks to Halt DOL Fiduciary Rule

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • FACC, an insurance group, is asking to delay implementation until its existing lawsuit against Labor is resolved.

The Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice and several independent insurance agents filed for a preliminary injunction late Tuesday in federal court, seeking to force the Labor Department to delay implementation of its new fiduciary rule.

The filing — the group’s second — in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas argues that Labor’s rule will cause too much damage if it goes into effect, so the court needs to delay its implementation until FACC’s existing case against Labor’s PTE 2020-02 on rollover advice is resolved.

On May 2, FACC and several independent insurance agents were the first to sue Labor, seeking a preliminary injunction “to stop the new rule from taking effect” during FACC’s existing case.

FACC’s first filing maintained that Labor lacks the authority to promulgate the rule. Industry officials have said that even on a fast track, the lawsuit will take a while.

The new filing requests that the court issue an order “staying the effective date of the 2024 Fiduciary Rule and amendments to PTE 84-24, preliminarily enjoining their enforcement pending a final judgment” in FACC’s existing case, or both.

The suit contends that the changes made to PTE 84-24 create “onerous conditions that insurance agents must meet to receive commission compensation if they are deemed fiduciaries” under the new 2024 fiduciary rule.

Lawmakers have also stepped in. On May 15, four senators — three Republicans and one Democrat — introduced a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to overturn the rule.

FACC’s New Filing

In its new filing, FACC and the plaintiffs assert that Labor is “reimagining” the 50-year-old Employee Retirement Income Security Act “to pursue its own agenda in direct contravention of a decision rendered only six years ago by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit,” which struck down Labor’s 2016 fiduciary rule.

“Propelled by its conviction that existing law does not adequately protect retirement investors, the DOL has defied Congress and the Fifth Circuit by adopting new rules virtually indistinguishable from a predecessor 2016 regulation that was emphatically struck down by the Fifth Circuit,” the filing states.

“Whereas the core holding of the Fifth Circuit decision was that not all financial salespeople are fiduciaries under ERISA, the DOL’s new regulation now decrees that any insurance agent who merely complies with state insurance laws when dealing with an ERISA plan member or owner of an Individual Retirement Account … is a fiduciary,” the lawsuit continues.

“By doing so, the DOL exceeds its authority and devises rules that are contrary to law, arbitrary, and capricious,” the filing states.

The new fiduciary rule and amended PTE 84-24 first take effect on Sept. 23, 2024, the lawsuit continues.

“Revised PTE 84-24 contains a phase-in period of one year during which certain supervisory requirements imposed on insurers do not apply,” the lawsuit explains.

“However, during the phase-in period, the Agents must still comply with onerous requirements that include acknowledging to clients that they are fiduciaries. They must also satisfy the exemption’s ‘Impartial Conduct Standards,’ which includes compliance with a ‘Care Obligation’ and ‘Loyalty Obligation’ applicable to ERISA fiduciaries, and receive no more than ‘reasonable compensation,’” the lawsuit states.

“The Agents must immediately begin incurring the time and expense of preparing for the phase-in period requirements that take effect in just four months,” the lawsuit states.

“Accordingly, preliminary injunctive relief is needed to avoid irreparable harm during the pendency of this lawsuit.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.