Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Photo illustration of Labor Department with President Joe Biden and Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > DOL

Critics Take Aim at New DOL Fiduciary Rule

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

While the much-anticipated new fiduciary rule released Tuesday by the Labor Department received applause from industry groups and some lawmakers, the proposal is not without its critics.

Some predict Labor’s new plan, the Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary, will face legal challenges as its predecessor rule did.

The proposals include a 60-day period for public comments. Labor also intends to hold a public hearing approximately 45 days after the proposals are published.

President Joe Biden said Tuesday afternoon at the White House that with the new fiduciary rule, his administration “is taking on what we call junk fees.”

The administration’s central concern, Biden said, is that while “most financial advisors give their clients good advice at a fair price and are honest with them, … that’s not always the case. Some advisors and brokers steer their clients toward certain investments, not because they’re in the best interest of the client, but because it means the best payout for the broker.”

Ken Bentsen, president and CEO of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said in a statement that “upon initial review, we are concerned that the Department’s newest proposal may go too far.”

Since Labor first proposed a change to the definition of fiduciary, “the landscape has changed greatly,” most notably with the introduction of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Best Interest, he said.

Reg BI, Bentsen said, “implemented a best interest standard that did not exist at the time of the 2015 DOL re-proposal and foundationally improved the protections in place for retirement savers. SIFMA long supported a best interest standard of care for brokers. That standard is now in place — it is robust and expansive with significant duties and obligations imposed on broker-dealers that unquestionably enhances investor protection.”

Labor’s new plan, Bentsen stated, “may go too far, inconsistent with existing federal regulations such as Reg BI and as a result could limit access to advice and education while also limiting investor choice in advisors.”

Chris Iacovella, president and CEO of the American Securities Association, said in another statement that the Biden administration’s “attempt to justify new rules for financial advisors as stopping ‘junk fees’ is purposefully designed to mislead to the American people,” noting ASA’s support for Reg BI.

“Similar to the Obama administration’s DOL fiduciary rule, the Biden administration’s fiduciary rule lacks any empirical and legal basis to be adopted as a final rule,” Iacovella opined.

Labor’s rule “also raises significant legal questions,” Iacovella said. “Rather than follow the letter of the law, the DOL has chosen to blatantly violate the legal authority” under which Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su may perform duties related to official actions like rulemakings, Iacovella said, “under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.”

Given that Su has been acting secretary for over 210 days, Iacovella continued, the fiduciary proposal “and any other official action approved by Su at the DOL will be the subject of strict legal scrutiny.”

Labor, Iacovella added, “needs to cease any further action on this rulemaking because no American deserves to be locked out of retirement options or have their financial security threatened for political gain.”

Fred Reish, partner at Faegre Drinker in Los Angeles, said he sees the insurance industry challenging the new fiduciary proposal and the related amendments to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24, which covers annuity transactions.

“While it is less certain, I think it is likely that some part of the securities industry will also challenge the proposed fiduciary definition that says that a rollover recommendation is a fiduciary regulation subject to the fiduciary standards and the conflicts restrictions,” Reish told ThinkAdvisor Wednesday in an email.

Labor’s new fiduciary proposal, according to Wayne Chopus, president and CEO of the Insured Retirement Institute in Washington, doubles down “on a previously failed policy that clearly runs counter to the goals of Bidenomics.”

Said Chopus in a statement: “Despite labeling the proposal as ‘retirement security’ … the rule will only increase retirement insecurity and result in millions of lower- and middle-income workers and retirement savers losing access to needed financial advice.”

Bidenomics, Chopus opined, “is supposed to be about growing the economy from the bottom up and the middle out, but this proposal will drop the bottom out for millions of Americans struggling to achieve their retirement goals.”

IRI, Chopus said, “will fight this proposal just as we did with DOL’s 2016 poorly concocted fiduciary rule that also masqueraded as consumer protection but instead caused extensive harm.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the 2016 rule in 2018, Chopus said, “but not before 10 million smaller retirement account owners, with more than $900 billion in retirement savings, lost the ability to work with their preferred financial professionals.”

Photo Illustration: Chris Nicholls/ALM; photos of Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su and President Joe Biden, Bloomberg; photo of DOL headquarters: Shutterstock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.