Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
SEC headquarters building in Washington

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Seeks More Comments on Controversial Custody Rule Plan

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • SEC reopened the comment period to allow for feedback on new private fund advisor rules.
  • On Wednesday, the SEC adopted new rules and rule amendments to enhance the regulation of private fund advisors.
  • Given the fundamental changes proposed in the new custody plan, the comment period was woefully short, says attorney Morgan.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Wednesday that it has reopened the comment period on its proposed rule that would redesignate and amend the current custody rule under the Investment Advisers Act.

The proposed Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets rule was released by the Commission on Feb. 15, and the initial comment period ended on May 8. The comment period will remain open until 60 days after the date of publication of the reopening release in the Federal Register.

The SEC has received voluminous feedback on the new custody rule plan so far.

The reopened comment period “will allow interested persons additional time to analyze the issues and prepare comments in light of the final rules and amendments to certain rules” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to enhance the regulation of private fund advisors, the SEC said.

New Private Fund Rules, Compliance Review Changes

On Wednesday, the SEC adopted new rules and rule amendments to enhance the regulation of private fund advisors and update the existing compliance rule that applies to all investment advisors.

The new rules and amendments, according to the SEC, “are designed to protect private fund investors by increasing transparency, competition, and efficiency in the private funds market.”

The commission said the new rules were “designed to protect investors who directly or indirectly invest in private funds by increasing visibility into certain practices involving compensation schemes, sales practices, and conflicts of interest through disclosure.”

Gail Bernstein, general counsel for the Investment Adviser Association in Washington, explained Wednesday that the SEC rulemaking “also includes a new requirement that will apply to all advisers, not just advisers to private funds.’

All advisors, Bernstein said, “will now be required to document their annual compliance review in writing. While the IAA has kept our members informed of this development (which was in the proposal), it may not have been more widely followed outside of private fund advisers. It’s important that all advisers are made aware and understand the importance of this new requirement.”

Nicolas Morgan, a partner with Paul Hastings and former SEC attorney, said that while the final private fund rules “shed some proposals that would have fundamentally interfered with the relationship between fund managers and limited partners, the rules continue to represent a watershed change in the SEC’s level of involvement in those contractual relationships. And this particular group of investors, limited partners in hedge funds and private equity funds, are highly sophisticated with strong economic leverage.”

In other words, Morgan added in an email, “these investors are fully capable of looking out for their own interests without the SEC dictating terms of their contractual relationships. Litigation challenging the rules appears likely.”

As to the SEC reopening the comment period on the new custody rule plan, Morgan said that “given the fundamental changes the proposed custody rule would impose on advisors, the original comment period was woefully short.”

In particular, Morgan continued, “the expansion of the custody rule over all assets is poorly conceived and will cause increased costs and decreased options for investors who might choose to use the services of an advisor who cannot afford to comply with the proposed rule. Hopefully, the additional time will enable the submission of further comments highlighting the rule’s unintended negative consequences.”

Bernstein noted in her statement that the new rule will require “all private fund advisers to undergo an annual audit under the conditions of the existing custody rule. We commend the Commission for reopening the safeguarding proposal to allow commenters to assess its interplay with the new audit rule.”

The IAA, Bernstein said, “has pressed the SEC to consider its current rulemaking activity holistically and cumulatively and also provide meaningful opportunity for public feedback on how the various proposals interact with one another.”

According to a fact sheet released by the SEC Wednesday, the new private funds rules require private fund advisers registered with the commission to:

  • Provide investors with quarterly statements detailing information regarding private fund performance, fees and expenses;
  • Obtain an annual audit for each private fund; and
  • Obtain a fairness opinion or valuation opinion in connection with an advisor-led secondary transaction.

The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill, released by the House Appropriations Committee in mid-June, prohibits the SEC from using any funds to finalize or implement its new custody rule, the proposed Regulation Best Execution, and the agency’s planned environmental, social and governance rule.

The SEC has said it plans to finalize the controversial new custody rule this year.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.