Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
A judge holding a gavel in a court room

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > DOL

Second Judge Strikes Down DOL Rollover Guidance

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A second judge has ruled the Labor Department’s guidance that declared rollover advice fiduciary advice should be struck down.

The ruling is a victory for the Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice, an advocacy group representing independent insurance distributors.

In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Judge Rebecca Rutherford ruled on June 30 to vacate portions of Labor’s Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02, Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees, which establishes more stringent rollover rules.

Advisory firms are now required to provide “retirement investors” with the specific reasons why a rollover or transfer of their retirement money is in the best interest of the retirement investor.

According to the order, Rutherford said that the court should vacate the portions of the exemption’s text and preamble that consider the following to be fiduciary advice:

  • Review of a single rollover “can be the beginning of an ongoing advice relationship” to Title II plans;
  • inclusion of potential “future, ongoing relationships” to Title II plans; and
  • that “an ongoing advisory relationship spanning both the Title I Plan and the IRA satisfies the regular basis prong” of ERISA’s five-part test on when investment advice is fiduciary advice.

A federal court in Tampa, Florida, ruled in mid-February that Labor’s interpretation of the five-part test setting out who qualifies as a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act was “arbitrary and capricious.”

Labor dismissed in mid-May its appeal of the Florida ruling.

Kim O’Brien, FACC’s CEO, told ThinkAdvisor Monday in an email that the group is “pleased the Magistrate Judge is recommending that District Judge Kinkeade vacate portions of DOL’s overreaching reinterpretation of the five-part test to the extent it intermixes IRAs with employer ERISA plans to determine who is a fiduciary.”

To the extent “others suggest these rulings somehow do not matter because DOL will be issuing new rules on rollovers, we think that misses the point.” O’Brien continued.

The recommendation in the FACC case, consistent with the Florida case brought by the American Securities Association, “makes clear there is a line between Title I employer plans and Title II IRAs which DOL cannot cross under ERISA which eliminates or strictly narrows DOL’s ability to regulate rollovers through some kind of fiduciary rule. “

FACC Case

In February 2022, the Federation filed its challenge to Labor’s PTE 2020-02 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

The Federation alleged that “Labor has ‘resurrected and repackaged’ the substance of its vacated 2016 rule in direct violation of the 5th Circuit decision” by allowing PTE 2020-02 to take effect, Phyllis Borzi, former head of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration, told ThinkAdvisor in a previous interview.

The Federation’s case asked the court to vacate PTE 2020-02 “in its entirety and enjoin DOL from implementing or enforcing it in any manner,” Borzi said.

On Sept. 7, Labor asked the court to dismiss the FACC suit “for lack of standing, alleging the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate actual injury-in-fact, especially since insurance agents are not forced to use PTE 2020-02 to receive conflicted compensation, since the long-standing PTE 84-24 which allows for insurance agent commissions is still available,” Borzi explained.

Rutherford denied Labor’s request.

ERISA attorneys have warned that the PTE-2020-02 is still in effect despite the Florida ruling.

New Fiduciary Rule

Labor announced in its most recent regulatory flexibility agenda that a new fiduciary rule would be released in August.

The agenda states that the conflict of interest in investment advice rule would amend the regulatory definition of the term fiduciary “to more appropriately define when persons who render investment advice for a fee to employee benefit plans and IRAs are fiduciaries within the meaning of section 3(21) of ERISA and section 4975(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.”

ERISA attorney Fred Reish of Faegre Drinker told ThinkAdvisor in a recent interview that Labor’s new fiduciary rule “may modify PTE 2020-02 but it will not go away. If anything, it will only be amended. By and large, I believe the DOL is satisfied that the requirements in the PTE work well to improve advice to participants and IRA owners.”

O’Brien added that FACC hopes DOL “will reconsider the need for more [fiduciary-related] rulemaking in light of these decisions and other developments, including adoption of Reg BI by the SEC and adoption of the NAIC model best interest regulation by a large and growing number of states.”

FACC, O’Brien added, hopes Labor “will consider whether the time has come to suspend their rulemaking efforts to avoid further confusion and controversy in favor of permitting the industry’s functional regulators to pursue a more holistic approach by applying reasonable best interest requirements across all sales including retirement and non-retirement accounts.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.