Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Melanie Waddell

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Exams Can't Keep Up With RIA Growth

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Since 2016, the number of SEC-registered advisors has increased 25%, while the SEC exam staff has increased by just 4%.
  • The SEC plans to significantly increase onsite exams of advisors within the next six months, but a lack of resources may slow the process.
  • Options that have been on the table for increasing SEC exam frequency all require congressional action.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s ability to oversee the growing number of registered investment advisors has come to the fore once again.

The topic was debated at a recent meeting of the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, with industry and SEC officials grappling with how to handle this ongoing challenge for the agency. While some officials believe more funding will do the trick, others see Congress having to step in — once again — to try and remedy the problem.

Paul Roye, former senior vice president of Capital Research and Management Co., and a former head of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, explained at the meeting that, unlike broker-dealers, there’s no self-regulatory organization to assist the SEC in overseeing the investment advisory industry. Thus, the SEC and the states “are the only entities conducting exams of investment advisors.”

In 2022, Roye said, the SEC examined 15% of RIAs. The RIA exam rate has remained mostly stable since 2019, according to SEC reports. In contrast, the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority “together examined nearly half of registered broker-dealers,” Roye, a member of the Investor Advisory Committee, said.

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, advisors with at least $100 million in assets under management must register with the SEC. Advisors with fewer assets must register in the states “where they have a principal place of business or have more than a de minimis number of clients,” Roye said.

“There were over 35,000 investment advisors in the United States” as of 2021, with almost 375,000 investor advisor representatives, Roye continued. “Investment advisory firms manage almost $129 trillion, and serve over 65 million clients.”

Since 2016, Roye said, “the number of SEC-registered advisors has increased 25% to over 15,000, and this is a growth rate that far outpaces SEC’s staff increases. Over the same period, the SEC exam staff has increased only 4%.”

In 2021 alone, “900 new advisors registered with the SEC,” Roye relayed. “The largest increase in SEC-registered entities has occurred in the investment advisory industry.”

Roye added this growth “is due, at least in part, to many in the broker-dealer industry migrating to the investment advisor industry.” Since 2012, the number of broker-dealer firms has declined 18%, he said.

The growth in the number of RIAs “does not fully capture the increasing complexity of the investment management industry, whose firms are developing more sophisticated trading and investing strategies, and this results in increasing complexity of the compliance issues and risks covered by examinations,” Roye stated.

In his remarks at the Investor Advisory Committee meeting, SEC Commissioner Jaime Lizarraga, a Democrat, noted that investment advisors “provided asset management services to 47.3 million individual investors in 2020, almost all of whom were non-high net worth individuals. Just one year later, that number grew to 50.6 million clients.”

Commissioner Hester Peirce, a Republican, noted in her comments that “determining how best to deploy the Division of Examination’s never-enough resources is a yearly challenge.” The SEC’s exam staff, she said, “is the face of the commission, and we need to figure out how best to support them in their work.”

Natasha Vij Greiner, deputy director of the SEC’s Division of Examinations, said at the meeting that the SEC plans to “significantly” increase onsite exams of advisors within the next six months, adding that the 15% exam rate in 2022 was “achieved despite continued growth” in the RIA industry.

“Going forward, as the industry continues to grow and change, maintaining our coverage ratio can only be achieved with sustained investments in human capital and technology resources,” Greiner said.

However, Amy Lynch, founder and president of FrontLine Compliance, told me that doing more onsite exams starting in April “will slow the process down, not speed it up. So the challenge will remain unless Congress provides more funding or the growth rate of advisors slows, which is highly unlikely, given the exodus from the sell side to the buy side.”

Compared with off-site exams, onsite exams ”force the examiners to be focused on just the one exam, so they cannot multi-task on several exams at a time,” Lynch said. “Plus, [onsite exams] tend to be more focused and lead to more follow-up questions from examiners. Onsite exams tend to lead to more findings for this reason. They are much more thorough than off-site exams.”

The SEC, Lynch added, “could also take different approaches to how exams are conducted, such as doing more limited-scope exams or targeted exams” to help boost the exam rate.

Greiner noted that challenges for the exam division include not only the growth in the RIA industry but also new products and risks.

Former SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt, who’s now CEO of Kalorama Partners in Washington, told me in an email that it has been his view “for a very long period of time that the SEC is NOT able adequately to examine” advisors.

“The growth in the industry simply makes it impossible for the SEC to keep up,” Pitt said. “Its use of specific subject matters for review is creative, but ultimately unavailing. There is a need for a private sector regulatory body. The SEC could facilitate this development by encouraging RIAs voluntarily to join a private sector regulatory body.”

RIAs, Pitt said, “would be required to undergo compliance audits, with reports given to the SEC staff. That would enable the SEC to pick up any trends as they develop.”

Congressional Action Needed

In 2011, to help boost the SEC’s exam rate of advisors, Dodd-Frank raised the assets under management threshold for state regulation of investment advisors from $25 million to $100 million. As a result, 2,100 advisors switched to state registration.

Michael Canning, principal and founder of the LXR Group in Washington and a former director of government affairs at the North American Securities Administrators Association, told me that Congress will have to get involved again.

“It’s fair to say that there is no way the [advisor exam rate] problem gets addressed without congressional involvement, and you don’t get congressional involvement on an issue this complex or this important to so many stakeholders unless you hold a few hearings,” Canning explained.

Options that have been on the table for increasing SEC exam frequency all require congressional action, he said.

Those options, Canning explained, include: lifting the cap for federal registration in Dodd-Frank so that states take on more responsibility; creating a self-regulatory organization for RIAs; or authorizing the SEC to assess user fees to fund additional exams.

“In theory, the SEC could recognize an IA SRO under its existing authority, but no one I’ve ever spoken with inside or outside the agency believes it would take this step absent direction from Congress,” Canning added.

Unfortunately, he continued, “I don’t think we’ll get a sense for where this issue ranks in terms of House Financial Services Committee priorities for the year — including with respect to potential for hearings — until [SEC Chairman Gary] Gensler testifies for the first time before the newly reconstituted” committee.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.