Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
SEC building image taken by ALM

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Votes to Expand Advisor Custody Rule

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The rule will apply not just to client securities and funds but to any client assets under advisor custody, including cryptocurrencies.
  • An RIA trade group finds the short implementation timeline concerning.
  • The SEC also voted to shorten the standard settlement cycle to one business day (T+1).

The Securities and Exchange Commission voted 4-1 Wednesday to expand the scope of the current advisor custody rule beyond client funds and securities to include any client assets of which an advisor has custody, including cryptocurrencies.

The SEC proposed a new rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to address how RIAs safeguard client assets, which “uses the more expansive and explicit language employed by Congress in empowering the Commission to develop rules to protect client assets” when advisors have custody.

“I support this proposal because, in using important authorities Congress granted us after the financial crisis, it would help ensure that advisers don’t inappropriately use, lose, or abuse investors’ assets,” SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said Wednesday during the open meeting.

“In particular, Congress gave us authority to expand the advisers’ custody rule to apply to all assets, not just funds or securities,” Gensler said. “Further, investors would benefit from the proposal’s changes to enhance the protections that qualified custodians provide. Thus, through this expanded custody rule, investors working with advisers would receive the time-tested protections that they deserve for all of their assets, including crypto assets, consistent with what Congress envisioned.”

Congress, Gensler added, “granted us new authorities in 2010 in response to the financial crisis and Bernie Madoff’s frauds.”

These authorities, Gensler continued, “are important, as investment advisers advise investors or funds with literally trillions of dollars of assets under management. They advise hedge funds, pension and retirement funds, endowments, or the public via robo-adviser apps.”

The proposal would cover all asset classes that an advisor may custody, such as privately issued securities, real estate and derivatives. “Assets,” the SEC explained, would mean “funds, securities, or other positions held in a client’s account.”

Like the current rule, Gensler said, the proposed rule “would entrust safekeeping of client assets to qualified custodians, including, for example, certain banks or broker-dealers.”

Gail Bernstein, general counsel for the Investment Adviser Association in Washington, explained in an email to ThinkAdvisor that the SEC’s plan is a ”redesignation of the current custody rule to the proposed new safeguarding rule.”

A Tight Timeline

The SEC’s plan, Bernstein said, “expands the reach of the [custody] rule well beyond what it is today. It will expand from covering a client’s funds and securities to include all assets in a client’s portfolio with an adviser, like crypto, derivatives, real estate and more. This expansion will have important implications for advisers, clients and the markets.”

IAA, Bernstein said, is “concerned that today’s proposal will substantially extend the current Custody Rule with a very tight timeline in light of its complexity and the very full regulatory agenda. This will make thoughtful and thorough input very challenging, especially given how the many outstanding proposals might interact with one another.”

Bernstein added that IAA is “just beginning to analyze the proposal, and will work closely with our members to assess its implications,” but the plan “is a major departure from how the rule will treat an adviser’s discretionary advice and will subject all of an adviser’s authorized trading on behalf of its clients to the new rule. This narrows even further a position the SEC staff has taken over the past few years applying the Custody Rule differently based on how a transaction settles.”

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, a Republican, voted no and voiced concern with “significant aspects of the proposed approach and its implementation timeline,” noting that her first ”set of concerns is around timing.”

The rule, Peirce said, “has broad implications for investors, investment advisers, and custodians. To get it right, we need the thoughtful input of commenters.”

Comments are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, “which does not allow the public enough time to analyze all aspects of this proposal, particularly in light of the already loaded rulemaking docket,” Peirce stated. “Moreover, the proposed implementation period — at one year for large advisers and eighteen months for smaller advisers — is too short.”

Crypto Concerns

SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda, a Republican, pointed to significant concerns he has with the “no-win” scenario that the proposal paints for crypto assets.

The proposing release “makes clear that crypto assets are covered by the proposed rule and then questions whether an investment adviser could ever satisfy the proposed requirements for crypto assets,” Uyeda said.

The SEC’s plan also requires advisors to “enter into direct contractual relationships with their advisory clients’ custodians,” Uyeda said, as well as “to demand certain contractual terms and obtain certain reasonable assurances from qualified custodians.”

Proposed changes were also approved Wednesday to update and enhance related recordkeeping requirements for advisors and amend Form ADV “to align reporting obligations with the proposed rule and to improve the accuracy of custody-related data available to the Commission, its staff and the public.”

T+1 Transition

The SEC also adopted by a 3-2 vote Wednesday rule changes to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions in securities from two business days after the trade date (T+2) to one (T+1).

Gensler said that the rule “addresses one of the four areas the staff recommended the Commission address in response to the meme stock events of 2021. Taken together, these amendments will make our market plumbing more resilient, timely, orderly, and efficient.”

Ken Bentsen, president and CEO of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said in a statement that while SIFMA appreciates the commission “finalizing its rule to provide certainty,” the group “strongly” disagrees with the implementation date of May 2024.

Said Bentsen: “As we have repeatedly stated for the past two years, the industry needs ample time to execute the transition and doing so following the Labor Day weekend 2024 in coordination with Canada is the optimal date. It is the industry, and not the regulators, who will do the work to shorten the cycle and rushing the implementation for no apparent reason will only add risk when the underlying goal is to mitigate risk.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.