Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
SEC headquarters in Washington (Photographer: Zach Gibson/Bloomberg)

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Charges BNY Mellon, Oppenheimer, Other Firms With Municipal Disclosure Failures

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The four firms sold new issue municipal bonds without obtaining required disclosures for investors, the SEC said.
  • SEC staff has begun investigations of other firms’ reliance on the limited offering exemption.
  • These are the first actions taken by the SEC for failing to comply with municipal bond offering disclosure requirements.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Tuesday that it has filed a litigated action against Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and has reached settlements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets LLC, TD Securities LLC, and Jefferies LLC, for failing to comply with municipal bond offering disclosure requirements.

“These are the first SEC actions addressing underwriters who fail to meet the legal requirements that would exempt them from obtaining disclosures for investors in certain offerings of municipal bonds,” the SEC said.

According to the SEC’s complaint and the settled orders, during different periods since 2017, the four firms sold new issue municipal bonds without obtaining required disclosures for investors.

Each of the firms purported to rely on an exemption to the typical disclosure requirements called the limited-offering exemption, but they did not take the steps necessary to satisfy the exemption’s criteria, the SEC said.

The SEC’s orders find that BNY, TD and Jefferies each violated Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which establishes disclosures that must be provided to investors, as well as Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rule G-27 and Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act.

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the firms agreed to settle the charges, cease and desist from future violations of those provisions, be censured and pay the following monetary relief:

  • BNY Mellon: $656,833.56 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a $300,000 penalty
  • TD Securities: $52,955.92 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a $100,000 penalty
  • Jefferies: $43,215.22 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a $100,000 penalty

“I applaud the excellent work of the Division’s Public Finance Abuse Unit in bringing these first-ever actions in the $4 trillion municipal bond space,” said Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement in a statement. “We encourage underwriters to examine their practices and to self-report any failures to us before we identify them ourselves.”

The SEC’s complaint against Oppenheimer, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, charges the same violations in connection with at least 354 offerings.

The complaint also alleges that Oppenheimer made deceptive statements to issuers in violation of MSRB Rule G-17, which prohibits deceptive, dishonest or unfair practices. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and a civil money penalty.

As a result of its findings, the SEC said staff has begun investigations of other firms’ reliance on the limited-offering exemption.

Firms that believe their practices do not comply with the securities laws are encouraged to contact the SEC at [email protected].


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.