HRA Expansion Boosts Concierge Medical Care

In the latest of a series of guidance that generally expands the availability and use of health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), the IRS recently proposed regulations dealing with direct primary care arrangements. More commonly known as “concierge care,” a direct primary care arrangement allows an individual and a primary care physician enter a contract to cover the cost of medical care for a fee (without the involvement of a traditional third-party insurance company).

With interest in concierge care growing amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the regulations could have a wide-ranging effect for clients interested in concierge care — they affect the medical expense deduction, availability of HRA reimbursements and eligibility for HSA participation.

While the rules might initially seem advantageous, employers and employees who choose to participate risk losing valuable tax-preferred health savings options — so should carefully evaluate their options before jumping in.

The Proposal and Concierge Care 

Under the regulations, a direct primary care arrangement may be classified as medical care or medical insurance. Classification would depend upon the facts of the specific arrangement. For example, an arrangement that provides only an annual physical exam would be classified as medical care, not insurance. Similarly, an arrangement that only covers specified treatment for a specific condition would not qualify as “insurance.”

Payments must be made to a primary care physician, which is defined as one who specializes in family medicine, pediatrics, geriatrics or internal medicine.

Regardless of how the arrangement is classified, the payments would be eligible for HRA reimbursement. Further, they will be eligible for the Section 213 federal tax deduction for medical expenses — to the extent that the taxpayer’s medical costs exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income for the tax year.

The regulations also address contributions to health care sharing ministries. These arrangements involve an agreement where members (who often share similar religious beliefs) pool their funds by making monthly payments into a fund that will cover the health costs of other members. The health care sharing ministry itself must have existed as of Dec. 31, 1999, and qualify as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization.

The regulations clarify that these arrangements will be treated as medical insurance for IRC purposes as long as members remain eligible for reimbursement even if they have developed a medical condition.

Look Before You Leap: Effect on HSAs

The IRS proposal would open the window for HRA reimbursement, but individuals covered by these arrangements would lose eligibility to contribute to an HSA under most circumstances. Individuals are only eligible to contribute to a health savings account if they are enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) and have no other comprehensive medical insurance.

HDHPs must impose certain strict limits on the annual deductible and annual out-of-pocket expenses. If the participant has another option available, HSA eligibility is lost. For many, HSAs provide a valuable tax-preferred savings option — one in which contributions can even be carried over from year to year and used as a type of retirement health savings vehicle.