NASAA Opposes SEC Plan to Expand Accredited Investor Definition

The entities or institutions that would qualify as accredited investors under the proposal include investment advisors — both federal and state-registered — limited liability and rural business investment companies and family offices with at least $5 million in assets under management as well as their family clients.

NASAA opposes the SEC proposal on several counts. Among its major objections:

• It fails to adjust for inflation the income and net worth requirements for individual “accredited investors,” which were set in 1982, when the rule first took effect. They include an annual income of $200,000, or $300,000 on a joint basis, for two consecutive years and a net worth topping $1 million. In 1982, 1.6% of American households qualified under this definition; today it’s about 13%, or 16 million. ”It’s implausible that 16 million American households currently have both the financial sophistication and the capacity to bear the kinds of investment losses that courts and prior Commissions have considered essential prerequisites for participation in private offerings,” Gerold wrote.     
• Securities exams and certifications are not sufficient criteria to assess financial sophistication. Significant relevant experience should also be required — NASAA suggests five years — along with the ability to sustain losses and the same income and net worth requirements for individuals to be considered an accredited investor.
• There is no accounting for the impact of expanding the pool of accredited investors on the public markets nor evidence that retail investors are clamoring to invest in private offerings or that legitimate private companies are eager to sell securities to retail investors.
• The $5 million threshold for some entities to be considered accredited investors is too low; it should be $10 million.

 NASAA suggests that before the SEC expands its definition of an accredited investor it gather data on private offerings to individual investors to better understand the types of companies and investors that reasonably should be dealing with one another.

“To deviate from longstanding standards for accredited investor status in favor of the concept offering in the Proposal would represent a significant departure from precedent  … and would likely lead to material harm for the retail investing public,” Gerold concludes.

— Check out SEC Advances Plan to Expand Accredited Investor Definition on ThinkAdvisor.