Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

SEC Disgorgement Bill, Passed in House, Could Affect Supreme Court Case

By Melanie Waddell

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The House passed  on Tuesday The Investor Protection and Capital Markets Fairness Act, H.R. 4344, intended to “substantially strengthen” the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to recover the wrongful gains of securities law violators for investors.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Ben McAdams, D-Utah, passed by a 314-95 vote, and would codify the SEC’s authority to seek the return, or disgorgement, of ill-gotten gains and would set a 14-year statute of limitations for the agency to do so.

The Investor Protection and Capital Markets Fairness Act is said to effectively overturn the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kokesh v. SEC allowing for a 5-year statute of limitations on disgorgement and would prevent such remedies from being defined as “a civil fine, penalty or forfeiture.’”

House passage of the bill comes as the Supreme Court agreed on Nov. 1 to hear another case involving the SEC’s clawback powers, which argues that the agency does not have the authority to seek disgorgement.

Nicolas Morgan, a partner at Paul Hastings in Los Angeles, told ThinkAdvisor in a Thursday email message that House passage of the bill will likely have bearing on the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in the appeal of Charles Liu and Xin Wang, which he discussed in a recent ThinkAdvisor blog post.

The SEC ordered Liu and Wang to disgorge $35 million for defrauding Chinese investors out of money that was supposed to be used for an EB-5 immigrant investor program. Under current law, Morgan wrote, “Liu and Wang argue that the SEC has no authority to seek disgorgement of that $35 million, and there is a decent chance the Supreme Court will agree.”

Melanie Waddell

@Think_MelanieW

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.