Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

4 Reasons the Advisor Compliance Landscape Is So Complex

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The current compliance environment is complex because it’s hard to predict what’s going to happen in certain areas — namely regarding automated advice, fee compression and the broker protocol, according to former Securities and Exchange Commission official John Walsh.

Walsh, now a partner at Eversheds Sutherland in Washington, said during a session at Charles Schwab’s annual Impact conference Monday that the current compliance landscape is “complex,” rather than complicated.

Complicated, he said, means “there are a lot of moving parts but the outcome is predictable.” Complex, on the other hand, also means there may be many moving parts, however, “we cannot predict what’s going to happen, what the outcome will be.”

Walsh, a former architect of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations who served as OCIE’s acting director as well as its associate director and chief counsel, pointed to four areas where the compliance realm is complex.

1. Automated advice.

It now “pervades the investment advisor business to the point that many advisors are relying on these platforms themselves,” Walsh said. The question for compliance professionals to ask is do they understand “what’s going on in these algorithms?” A recent example of an SEC case involving algorithms is the ongoing case involving F-Squared.

“The F-Squared saga isn’t over,” Walsh said. In this case, the SEC “went after the firms who developed the algorithms and those firms that used it.”

Walsh offered session attendees an action item: “You need to take a look at the process that you have in place on algorithms you produce or use.”

2. Fears of fee compression are growing. Is it real?

“There’s some debate,” Walsh said. “You can see it in terms of [mutual] funds and 12b-1 fees, but some advisors are raising their rates” and “going directly against fee compression,” he said. “Even if the compression has not yet reached you, the threat hangs over everyone.”

What does fee compression angst mean for compliance? “Compliance costs money,” Walsh said. “Most people view compliance as a cost center. Are we looking at a future where it’s harder to make a profit? What do you do? Cut costs,” he said, and likely in compliance.

Regulators are also “starting to show concern,” Walsh said. “SEC examination managers are reporting they are spending increasing time reviewing resources provided to compliance.”

3. Compliance requirements are in flux.

“Complexity comes from regulators shifting positions,” Walsh said. He said a “good example” of this shifting is the “four stages” of compliance around advisors’ receipt of 12b-1 fees.

While the SEC has required advisors to disclose that they receive them as well as that the receipt of 12b-1 fees poses a conflict, the SEC required earlier this year that advisors must disclose the availability of lower-cost shares, as well as that advisors must provide “itemized accounting of forgone lower-cost shares.”

Walsh stated that “all the attention to fiduciary duty” has put a spotlight on 12b-1 fees.

4. What will happen to the broker protocol?

“The industry is doing this one to itself,” Walsh said. The Protocol for Broker Recruiting, he explained, “allowed reps to move between firms with a fair amount of freedom, and firms entered into it to avoid fighting.”

In 2008, the SEC proposed “codifying” the protocol as part of Regulation S-P, the privacy rule, and it “got swept aside” by the financial crisis. The SEC “would have approved it if it wasn’t for the financial crisis.”

With firms dropping out and with reports that “recruiting has gotten harder,” what does this mean from a compliance standpoint?

The broker protocol uncertainty throws “a new light on Reg S-P, privacy and the movement of client information,” Walsh said. “I could see regulators getting interested in this. Make sure your recruiting rules cover Reg S-P. I would consider adding this as a topic in your annual review.”

Walsh added: “Has anyone [in your firm] ever looked to see what info new reps are bringing with them? If I were a betting person, I think that’s a question that regulators will be asking.”

— Check out Competition for Talent Is a Major Issue for RIAs on ThinkAdvisor.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.