Two weeks after being ordered to reinstate a branch manager fired for raising concerns about improper sales practices, Wells Fargo & Co. has acknowledged it could have a much larger whistleblower problem in the aftermath of a $185 million settlement with federal regulators and Los Angeles last year over allegations the bank opened up to 2.1 million unauthorized accounts.
Wells Fargo told federal regulators Friday in a quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it is facing “multiple single plaintiff Sarbanes-Oxley Act complaints and state law whistleblower actions filed with the Department of Labor or in various state courts alleging adverse employment actions for raising sales practice misconduct issues.” The report also noted that expanded regulatory oversight of the bank’s sales practices “may lead to a significant increase in the identified number of potentially unauthorized accounts.”
For Wells Fargo, the pending whistleblower complaints pose both a financial and reputational risk as the bank seeks to rebound from a scandal that prompted its chief executive, John Stumpf, to step down.
“Wells Fargo may have substantial exposure in some of the whistleblower cases because many of the whistleblowers were unable to secure comparable employment in the financial services industry. Therefore, back pay liability and lost future earnings in some of these cases will likely exceed $1 million,” said Jason Zuckerman, a whistleblower lawyer at Washington’s Zuckerman Law.
Last month, the U.S. Labor Department ordered Wells Fargo to pay $577,500 in back pay, damages and legal fees to a former branch manager in California who was fired in 2011 after raising concerns about three subordinates — described as “private bankers.” The department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration found that the branch manager’s reports were a contributing factor in her firing and made her eligible for whistleblower protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Act.
“No banking industry employee should fear retaliation for raising concerns about fraud and practices that violate consumer financial protections,” Barbara Goto, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s regional administrator in San Francisco, said in a statement then. “The U.S. Department of Labor will fully and fairly enforce the whistleblower protection laws under its jurisdiction.”
A Wells Fargo spokeswoman, in a statement, said: “We take seriously the concerns of current and former team members. This decision is a preliminary order and to date there has been no hearing on the merits of this case. We disagree with the findings and will be requesting a full hearing of the matter.”
Spokespeople at the Labor Department and Wells Fargo did not immediately respond to questions about whether the bank had formally appealed the agency’s order and how many whistleblower complaints have been filed in relation to the unauthorized accounts scandal.
Wells Fargo has paid out millions of dollars this year alone to whistleblowers, in matters unrelated to the sales scandal. On Friday, the bank agreed to resolve for $108 million claims that veterans were illegally billed mortgage refinancing fees.
In April, OSHA ordered Wells Fargo to pay $5.4 million to a former bank manager who reported suspected fraudulent behavior. That award—which Wells Fargo suggested it might contest—was the largest under OSHA’s whistleblower program, according to a New York Times report. That same month, Wells Fargo’s board released a 110-page report—prepared by the law firm Shearman & Sterling—that faulted the in-house legal team, in part, for failing to appreciate the gravity of the improper sales practices as alarm bells sounded.
Wells Fargo’s longtime general counsel, James Strother, and Carrie Tolstedt, once the head of community banking, both retired in the fallout from the sales scandal. Former Cravath, Swaine & Moore partner C. Allen Parker was named in March to replace Strothers, who’d planned to retire at the end of 2016 but stayed on to help guide the bank through the sham account scandal.
“To regain the trust we have lost, we must continue to be transparent with all our stakeholders and go beyond what has been asked of us by our regulators by reviewing all of our operations—leaving no stone unturned—so we can be confident we have done all that we can do to build a better, stronger Wells Fargo,” Tim Sloan, the bank’s chief executive, said in a statement Friday. “Today’s regulatory filing reminds us of this, because it includes evidence of much of that work, particularly as we have identified problems that we have committed to fix.”