Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Senior man with arthritis rubbing his hand

Life Health > Health Insurance

10 worst states for arthritis

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This article has been updated to include new arthritis prevalence data.

Arthritis can be a relentless enemy.

Some conditions that cause joint inflammation, such as lupus, may kill people quickly. In many other cases, a condition that starts out as a nuisance gradually takes over people’s lives, limiting their ability to handle the activities of daily living.

Chattanooga, Tennessee-based Unum has estimated that joint disorders cause 35% of its long-term disability insurance claims.

The Westlake Village, California-based American Association for Long Term Care Association says arthritis is the main cause of about 9% of long-term care insurance claims.

For insurance professionals, arthritis has two faces: in some cases, it can make getting clients the most helpful health-related insurance products difficult or impossible. In other cases, it can make clients keenly aware of health and disability risk without doing much to hurt their insurability. Closing a sale might be as simple as telling the client, “The underwriters approved your application.”

The effects of arthritis on underwriting and sales vary dramatically from condition to condition and from client to client.

Gout, for example, is a form of arthritis caused by the buildup of uric acid in the blood. It may have no effect on some people’s lifespan, but researchers in Japan reported in 2000 that it seemed to correlate with a 60% increase in the risk of dying in any given year.

Complications of rheumatoid arthritis, an inflammatory condition that can affect the whole body, might cut some people’s lifespans by about 10 to 15 years, but it might have no effects on others’ lifespans. Many people with the condition live into their 80s and 90s, according to the Atlanta-based Arthritis Foundation.

Osteoarthritis may have no effect on life expectancy at all.

One New York-based insurer says in a Web-based field underwriting manual that otherwise healthy people with mild osteoarthritis may be able to qualify for individual disability insurance at standard rates and typically can qualify for life insurance at preferred rates.

People with mild rheumatoid arthritis may be able to qualify for life insurance at standard rates and individual disability insurance at substandard rates.

When insurers write about how they think about the boundary between mild arthritis and moderate or severe arthritis, they typically mention warning signs such as use of narcotic drugs to control pain or recent joint surgery. They also talk about whether arthritic conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis have caused many of a client’s joints to fuse together.

For insurance professionals, one twist is that the prevalence of arthritis seems to vary widely from market to market.

In 2019, for example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that about 23.5% of U.S. adults ages 18 and older had arthritis, according to a CDC survey database.

One way to filter out the effects of age on the prevalence of a condition is to look just at the percentage of people ages 45 through 54 who have the condition.

At the state level, for adults ages 45 through 54, arthritis prevalence ranged from less than 18% in California and the District of Columbia up to almost 50% in West Virginia.

The U.S. median prevalence for people ages 45 through 54 fell to 26.2% in 2019 from 28.4% 10 years earlier.

10 Terrible States for Arthritis

Here’s a look at the 10 states with the worst increases in arthritis prevalence for people ages 45 through 54 between 2009 and 2019.

One possible reason could be the introduction of lucrative new arthritis drugs. Fighting arthritis can be a good moneymaker for pharmaceutical companies. That could encourage drug companies to push physicians to look harder for people with arthritis.

But factors such as nutrition, exercise habits or other factors could also increase the odds that people in some areas will develop arthritis.

10. Georgia

2009 Prevalence: 25.5% | 2019 Prevalence: 25.7% | Change: +0.2

9. Delaware

2009 Prevalence: 26.8% | 2019 Prevalence: 27.2% | Change: +0.4

8. Alabama

2009 Prevalence: 38.1% | 2019 Prevalence: 38.6% | Change: +0.5

7. Montana

2009 Prevalence: 29.3% | 2019 Prevalence: 30.0% | Change: +0.7

6. Wisconsin

2009 Prevalence: 25.4% | 2019 Prevalence: 26.6% | Change: +1.2

5. South Dakota

2009 Prevalence: 25.3% | 2019 Prevalence: 26.7% | Change: +1.4

4. Arkansas

2009 Prevalence: 35.8% | 2019 Prevalence: 37.3% | Change: +1.5

3. Idaho

2009 Prevalence: 24.6% | 2019 Prevalence: 27.4% | Change: +2.8

2. Tennessee

2009 Prevalence: 29.7% | 2019 Prevalence: 32.9% | Change: +3.2

1. West Virginia

2009 Prevalence: 38.0% | 2019 Prevalence: 48.8% | Change: +10.8

50 States of Data: Arthritis

This chart shows how the prevalence of arthritis among adults ages 45 to 54 changed in each state, and the District of Columbia, between 2009 and 2019.

One good place to go to get the data you need to create health indicator tables of your own is the CDC’s chronic disease data site.

Adults, ages 45-54, who have had some form of arthritis

..2009.. ..2014.. ..2019.. Change between 2009 and 2019, in percentage points
Alabama 38.1% 39.7% 38.6% +0.5
Alaska 27.8% 26.4% 23.0% -4.8
Arizona 31.4% 24.3% 24.6% -6.8
Arkansas 35.8% 36.8% 37.3% +1.5
California 23.2% 21.2% 17.5% -5.7
Colorado 24.9% 23.8% 19.0% -5.9
Connecticut 24.1% 21.1% 20.9% -3.2
Delaware 26.8% 28.8% 27.2% +0.4
District.of,Columbia 27.1% 20.9% 16.7% -10.4
Florida 27.6% 27.5% 23.6% -4.0
Georgia 25.5% 29.9% 25.7% +0.2
Hawaii 22.4% 20.5% 18.6% -3.8
Idaho 24.6% 25.2% 27.4% +2.8
Illinois 28.2% 26.6% 23.9% -4.3
Indiana 33.0% 31.9% 25.3% -7.7
Iowa 26.2% 23.6% 25.4% -0.8
Kansas 26.4% 27.5% 25.4% -1.0
Kentucky 41.4% 39.4% 38.3% -3.1
Louisiana 29.7% 27.7% 29.8% +0.1
Maine 32.3% 33.3% 31.1% -1.2
Maryland 27.6% 26.4% 22.1% -5.5
Massachusetts 25.5% 29.1% 22.5% -3.0
Michigan 35.6% 32.6% 32.7% -2.9
Minnesota 20.8% 19.4% 20.7% -0.1
Mississippi 33.0% 33.9% 27.4% -5.6
Missouri 34.7% 27.7% 27.0% -7.7
Montana 29.3% 25.6% 30.0% +0.7
Nebraska 25.6% 22.1% 22.9% -2.7
Nevada 27.2% 22.7% 18.6% -8.6
New Hampshire 28.9% 26.0% 26.1% -2.8
New Jersey 22.3% 20.9% NA +2.0
New Mexico 28.6% 25.7% 28.7% +0.1
New York 28.5% 23.3% 23.0% -5.5
North Carolina 30.8% 30.0% 29.8% -1.0
North Dakota 31.4% 28.5% 25.0% -6.4
Ohio 33.7% 32.6% 32.0% -1.7
Oklahoma 33.3% 28.0% 29.8% -3.5
Oregon 28.1% 24.9% 26.9% -1.2
Pennsylvania 33.2% 31.2% 29.8% -3.4
Rhode Island 30.3% 29.3% 26.0% -4.3
South Carolina 34.0% 32.1% 28.4% -5.6
South Dakota 25.3% 25.1% 26.7% +1.4
Tennessee 29.7% 36.6% 32.9% +3.2
Texas 25.2% 21.4% 21.2% -4.0
Utah 26.5% 23.9% 26.3% -0.2
Vermont 28.4% 27.9% 25.8% -2.6
Virginia 26.9% 27.6% 26.8% -0.1
Washington 28.9% 25.3% 24.3% -4.6
West Virginia 38.0% 42.5% 48.8% +10.8
Wisconsin 25.4% 24.2% 26.6% +1.2
Wyoming 28.9% 24.4% 26.5% -2.4
Source: Chronic Disease and Health Promotion Data & Indicators (CDC: 2009, 2014 and 2019 waves).

Credit: Adobe Stock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.