(Bloomberg) — When hospital executive Jeanette Wojtalewicz visits CHI Health’s Mercy Council Bluffs facility across the Missouri River in Iowa, she sees the new clinics and doctors’ offices partly paid for by the state’s decision to expand Medicaid to thousands of residents.
Back on her side of the river is CHI Health’s Creighton University Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska, a state that opposed making more low-income people eligible for the government health-insurance program. While Mercy thrives about seven miles away, Creighton is cutting 250 beds to raise efficiency amid slumping financial results.
“There’s not a big geographical difference, but because of the regulations, there are big differences in the numbers,” said Wojtalewicz, chief financial officer at CHI Health, a 15-facility, nonprofit hospital system.
The Affordable Care Act, the U.S. president’s signature health care law, is as divisive as ever six years after its passage, with Republicans including presidential candidate Donald Trump vowing to repeal it. Yet as critics focus on the legislation’s insurance mandates and penalties, the biggest impact has come from Medicaid expansion, a decision made at the state level. The 31 states that adopted it are receiving billions of dollars in federal funds, enabling more patients to gain access to care and shoring up the finances of hospitals strained by unpaid bills.
What Your Peers Are Reading
Related: Cleaning Up the Health Plan
Now the pressure is on the 19 states that haven’t embraced it — mostly because of objections from Republican governors or legislatures — as administration officials push for coverage gains in their last months of power to burnish President Barack Obama’s legacy. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has pledged, if elected, to work with governors to get more states on board.
“This isn’t a question of if, it’s a question of when,” Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said in a July interview in Iowa. “Our job right now is to do everything we can to make that ‘when’ be faster.”
It won’t be easy. Opponents like Nebraska Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts say costly entitlement programs aren’t a good solution to fight poverty, and states should look to private insurance to get more people covered, rather than rely on the federal government.
The number of uninsured people has dropped by an estimated 20 million since Obamacare was enacted in 2010. And yet more than 24 million adults are still without coverage today — many of them in states that aren’t widening Medicaid coverage, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released on Tuesday.
For their part, Iowa patients who became eligible after the state expanded have welcomed the move.
“It’s saved me, pretty much,” said Faith Van Gilder, a 57-year-old school cafeteria cook in Dayton who previously couldn’t afford insurance offered by her employer and scraped by on medication samples and assistance programs.
Medicaid now pays for all of her drugs, and she sees a clinician every six months for diabetes care. On a day in July at a community health center in nearby Fort Dodge, she was getting treatment for an ear condition. She can also get her teeth cleaned or a checkup when needed.
Patients are “relieved and grateful,” said Janet Lippis, who works in financial assistance at the city’s hospital, UnityPoint Health’s Trinity Regional Medical Center.
“They do follow-ups, and they’re doing preventative care and things like that that they did not do before,” Lippis said.
Hospitals also benefited from the extra care covered with federal money. Those in expansion states saw costs of uncompensated care fall by 35 percent in 2014 from a year earlier, while the costs in nonexpansion states declined 1.1 percent, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis published in June. Expansion would bring hospitals an estimated $2.9 billion in revenue next year in states that have resisted it as an additional 4.25 million individuals gain insurance, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.