Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
December 02, 2015 at 09:02 AM
Just days before lawmakers begin debating a spending bill that is said to include riders to defund the Department of Labor’s efforts to change the definition of fiduciary on retirement accounts, supporters of DOL’s plan urged House lawmakers on Wednesday not to introduce a measure to block it.
During a hearing held by the House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions to discuss legislation based on a “declaration of principles” proposed by Reps. Richard Neal, D-Mass, and Peter Roskam, R-Ill., the Financial Planning Coalition told lawmakers that such a bill was “unnecessary and would weaken, not strengthen” the fiduciary standard under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Roskam, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, is co-sponsoring with Neal as well as Phil Roe, R-Tenn., and Michelle Lujan Grisham, D-N.M., a bill that sets out a series of legislative principles that they say will “help strengthen the retirement security of working families and ensure retirement advisors protect their clients’ best interests.”
Roskam said Wednesday during an event held by the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors that the lawmakers are “building more bipartisan support” for the bill, but did not state when such a bill would be introduced.
He stated in late November, however, that he was bent on moving the bipartisan legislation through the House and Senate.
Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., chairman of the subcommittee, said during his opening remarks that he is working with Roskam and the other lawmakers to “develop a legislative solution that will accomplish what the Department of Labor has failed to.” The proposal, he said, “will strengthen retirement security, but, unlike the department’s approach – it will do so without hurting working families and small businesses.”
While DOL “listened” five years ago and pulled its first fiduciary rulemaking, Roe said, the DOL “seems determined to ignore legitimate bipartisan concerns” the second time around.
But Marilyn Mohrman-Gillis, managing director of public policy and communications for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, urged lawmakers during her Wednesday testimony to let DOL release “a final rule, and then take a look at it” to see if there are problems with it. “It’s well past time” for DOL to update the 40-year-old ERISA, she said, adding that “DOL is attempting to update a rule to effectuate congressional intent.”
A DOL spokesman agreed, stating Wednesday that “instead of undermining public confidence in the rulemaking process, members of Congress who are genuinely interested in protecting the savings of America’s workers should wait to see the results of the Department’s incredibly open and thorough process before proposing legislation on this issue.”
