A federal agency wants some health insurers to explain, in writing, why data reports for different Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) “three R’s” risk-management programs appear to tell conflicting stories.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) talks about what it believes to be big differences between health insurers’ risk corridors program data submissions and data the insurers filed for the PPACA reinsurance program and the PPACA risk-adjustment program.
Insurers with units that sell qualified health plans (QHPs) through the PPACA public exchange system will have to complete a new checklist to attest that their data filings comply with PPACA risk corridors program rules, CMS officials say in a paperwork change notice.
If companies have big differences in the data they filed for the risk corridors program and the data they filed for the PPACA risk-adjustment program, or for the PPACA reinsurance program, “CMS is requiring that issuers quantify these differences, and provide a written explanation of the magnitude of the discrepancy,” CMS officials say. “We require these descriptions to be approved by an actuary.”
The PPACA risk corridors program is supposed to use cash from PPACA public exchange plan issuers with good results in 2014, 2015 and 2016 to help issuers with poor results in years. Some have questioned whether enough insurers did well enough in 2014 to make good on risk corridors program obligations to the insurers that did poorly.
The PPACA risk-adjustment program is supposed to use cash from issuers with relatively low-risk enrollees to help issuers with high-risk enrollees, to keep insurers from outperforming competitors by finding ways to push away high-risk enrollees.
The PPACA reinsurance program is supposed to use a broad-based fee to pay a portion of the cost of individual coverage holders who file catastrophic claims in 2014, 2015 or 2016.