(Bloomberg) — The U.S. Supreme Court probably shouldn’t have accepted a lawsuit challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) health insurance subsidies, President Barack Obama said, calling it an “easy case.”
See also: King vs. Burwell: Does PPACA bully the states?
“Frankly it probably shouldn’t have even been taken up,” Obama said Monday at a news conference at the Group of Seven summit in Krun, Germany.
A decision is expected this month in the suit, King vs. Burwell (Case Number 14-114), which challenges the availability of tax credits to discount the cost of insurance in at least 34 states. Opponents of the law say it allows subsidies in no more than 16 states that run insurance marketplaces, called exchanges.
The court will decide whether the Internal Revenue Service erred in issuing a rule making tax credits available in every state, regardless of the type of insurance exchange its residents use. The Democrats who wrote PPACA say they always intended the credits to be available nationwide.
In a separate but related case, the court on Monday rejected a bid by Maine to escape one requirement of Obamacare. The justices left intact a federal appeals court decision that said Maine must continue offering Medicaid coverage to young adults until 2019.
The health law temporarily prohibited states from cutting eligibility under Medicaid, a state-run program for low-income people that was supposed to be expanded to cover more of the working poor. A 2012 Supreme Court decision made the expansion optional for states.
Risk losing discounts
In the case against insurance subsidies, more than 6 million consumers who purchased insurance through the federal healthcare.gov system risk losing discounts on their monthly premiums if the court rules against the Obama administration.
See also: Report: A Republican Supreme Court victory on PPACA could backfire in 2016 swing states