Despite the continuing debate about active versus passive asset management and the increasing popularity of ETFs, the majority of financial advisors haven’t changed their investment strategies and continue to favor active management, according to a new report from consulting firm Practical Perspectives.
An increasing number of advisors, however, have boosted their use of passively managed products, and that trend is expected to continue.
Sixty percent of the advisors surveyed left their investment allocations unchanged over the past year. Of the 40% who changed allocations, most did so by increasing their use of passively managed investments rather than their actively managed ones.
The report is based on data from 600 wirehouse, regional, independent and registered investment advisors, plus data from 525 advisors focusing on just liquid alternatives. “There are still a lot of traditionalist advisors,” said Howard Schneider, president of Practical Perspectives and co-author of the report, Major Trends Driving Change in Portfolio Construction. “Most advisors still tilt toward being primarily active or a blend between active and passive.”
Indeed, more than 80% of the advisors surveyed indicated significant or moderate use of active management strategies — with actively managed mutual funds being the most popular vehicle — while nearly 60% indicated the same for passive management. But the preferences may be shifting.
Over the next 12 months, almost 40% of advisors are expected to increase their investment in passively managed ETFs, compared with 30% in actively managed mutual funds. Driving the push for passively managed ETFs are the lower costs and tax efficiencies.
The investment categories for passively managed portfolios are the usual suspects. In equities they’re large-cap core, blend, growth and value and specialized sector categories. Among bonds, they’re U.S. government bonds, Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) and short-term bonds.