Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance

S&P sees PPACA risk corridors program funding gap

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Analysts at Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services say the effects of funding restrictions on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) risk corridors program may cause the program to hurt small and midsize health insurers.

Drafters of PPACA created the risk corridors program in an effort to make selling health insurance under PPACA rules less risky, by using cash from health insurers with good underwriting results for 2014, 2015 and 2016 to help insurers that get poor results for those years.

See also: CMS posts PPACA risk corridors program form 

Originally, insurers thought the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) division running the risk corridors program, could use general HHS funding to help to make up for any lack of contributions from insurers with good underwriting results.

HHS officials said in April 2014 that they would try to run the program in a “revenue neutral” fashion, without using taxpayer money.

Congress later put a provision prohibiting HHS from using taxpayer money to fund the risk corridors program in a government funding bill. President Obama signed the bill into law in December 2014.

Deep Banerjee and other S&P analysts say in a new commentary that health insurers with good results for 2014 may pay in enough cash to cover only about 10 percent of the “receivables,” or money that insurers with poor results are hoping to receive.

See also: CCIIO posts grandmothering relief numbers

“Uncertainty of payment due to underfunding can cause volatility in the market for all participants,” the analysts say.

About 56 percent of the carriers S&P analyzed recorded neither a payable nor a receivable for the risk corridors program. Another 30 percent recorded a receivable, and 14 percent recorded a payable. The analysts say some companies that could have posted receivables did not because they do not expect to be able to collect on risk corridors program receivables.

“Without adequate payments coming into the risk corridors, it is unclear to us how CMS can fund the program,” the S&P analysts write.

A risk corridors program failure would be a nuisance for the big national carriers but could wipe out more than 50 percent of the recorded capital of some of the newer, smaller insurers, the analysts say.

A risk corridors program failure could reduce capital levels at some well-known nonprofit regional carriers by about 20 percent, the analysts estimate.

See also: Feds post PPACA reinsurance program data


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.