Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance

PPACA's 5 biggest moments

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

As the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act celebrates a birthday on March 23, we look back on the law’s biggest moments.

Here are five of the law’s most important events.

Supreme Court case on the law’s constitutionality 
March 2012

The PPACA didn’t have to wait long for a truly big moment: Just two years after being signed into law, it went to the Supreme Court in a big way.

The court announced it would hear a case about the law’s constitutionality after 26 states — led by Florida — sued the government over the law’s linchpin, the individual mandate, arguing individuals couldn’t be forced to buy insurance. The court heard three days of politically charged arguments March 26–28, 2012 over the constitutionality of PPACA. It was a case that divided the nation.

Ultimately, we know what happened: On June 28, 2012, the court upheld the individual mandate as a tax by a 5-4 vote, though it ultimately left Medicaid expansion up to the states.


Disastrous rollout
October 2013

The Oct. 1, 2013, launch of PPACA’s federal exchange,, was a hugely anticipated moment for PPACA. But it (hugely) failed to meet expectations. was plagued with so many technical problems upon its launch — first and foremost the website’s inability to manage a heavy use load — that Congress decided to hold hearings about it later that month. Early enrollment numbers were far fewer than hoped or anticipated, partly because enrollees were unable to stay on the site long enough to sign up.

While in its second enrollment period still suffered from a number of glitches, it performed much better than during its first year.


Kathleen Sebelius’s resignation
April 2014

The resignation of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in April 2014 closed a major chapter in Obamacare. She resigned just as PPACA topped its first-year enrollment goal.

The secretary of five years was one of the major PPACA players from the beginning: She made a career out of praising, touting and defending the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. She announced the law’s milestones, and her achievements were directly tied to PPACA’s: expanded health care coverage, the elimination of pre-existing condition denial by carriers, and expanded Medicaid.

But she also endured backlash over the administration’s PPACA delays, answered questions about concerns over the law and even testified about it. And when suffered a disastrous rollout, she took the blame.

Sylvia Mathews Burwell, former director of the Office of Management and Budget, took over as HHS secretary in June 2014.

Photo: Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius listens as she testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, April 10, 2014, before the Senate Finance Committee hearing on the HHS Department’s fiscal Year 2015 budget. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)


The employer mandate delays

Though a number of the law’s components have been delayed over the years, the one with the most backlash was PPACA’s employer mandate — which became a lightning rod for criticism of the law.

The provision — once thought of as a key, if not essential, part of PPACA — since its inception has been vehemently attacked by employer groups and business owners. Originally scheduled to go into effect in 2014, the mandate was twice delayed by the administration, which said it needed more time to implement the provision. Those delays called into question whether the provision would ever be implemented, and whether the provision was even needed in the law.

Attention to the mandate hit a new high at the Benefits Selling Expo in April 2014, when Robert Gibbs predicted during a keynote address that the employer mandate would never be put into effect.

“I don’t think the employer mandate will go into effect. It’s a small part of the law. I think it will be one of the first things to go,” he said to a notably surprised audience.

Gibbs was proven wrong when the updated January 2015 deadline stuck for employers with more than 100 employees, who had either to offer insurance or pay a fine of $2,000 per worker. Meanwhile, employers with between 50 and 99 employees have until January 2016 to offer health insurance or pay a fine. Companies with fewer than 50 employees are exempt.

Photo: Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)


Subsidies challenge

In late 2014, it was announced that once again the Supreme Court would hear an important PPACA case, this one on the federal subsidies under the law.

The case, King v. Burwell, ultimately hinges on just four words — “established by the state” — as it calls into question the legality of federal exchanges. While PPACA challengers say that phrase limits the tax credits to the 16 states that have set up their own exchanges, the Obama administration has defended an IRS rule that interpreted the law as allowing subsidies nationwide.

Read: 5 things to know about SCOTUS subsidies case

Of course the decision has huge implications. Ruling the subsidies invalid could unravel the law, making other core provisions ineffective and potentially causing the market for individual insurance policies to collapse. And, invalidating the subsidies could boot nearly 10 million from health coverage and cause crushing premium increases for millions more.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case March 4. It is expected to make a decision by June.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.