Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
March 23, 2015 at 08:44 AM
SAN DIEGO – The National Association of Plan Advisors made something really clear Sunday: it has always embraced and will continue to support any government regulation that puts plan participants’ best interests first. Period.
That, however, doesn’t mean NAPA is whole-heartedly supporting the Department of Labor’s efforts to push forward with plans to impose the fiduciary standard on broker-dealers and anyone else in the financial services industry hoping to make money in the retirement plan business.
The fiduciary standard has long applied to retirement plan advisors, meaning they must put their clients’ interests ahead of their own. Broker-dealers, on the other hand, are held to a lower standard called “suitability.” Critics say brokers who work on commissions often steer clients to the mutual funds or other investments that pay them the highest fees. “Conflicted” advice, according to a White House memo leaked last month, is costing retirement savers more than $6 billion a year.
NAPA has expressed some measure of reservation about the proposed rule before now. But it went further at its 401(k) Summit on Sunday, adamantly expressing its opposition to any provisions in the coming regulation that might in any way hamper advisors’ ability to offer retiring clients help when they shift savings out of their employer plans to an IRA.
Brian Graff, the CEO of the American Retirement Association, part of NAPA, said that, according to his best educated guess, that was precisely what the DOL was planning to do, although the agency itself has been tightlipped about what its regulation might allow or what it might prohibit.
Addressing the audience during the opening moments of the conference, Graff left an impression that regulators had shared with him some of those closely held details. Later, he clarified he was a “very good educated guesser.”
With years under his belt as a lobbyist, Graff is viewed by many in the industry as one of its best-connected legislative and regulatory observers.
In any case, there’s no doubting the point he was making: half of the nation’s employer-sponsored plans have no feature in place that allows systematic withdrawals by retirees, generally forcing participants to roll over their assets into an IRA.
