Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance > Health Insurance

Dental insurers fight for D.C. niche

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Three big dental organizations want managers of the District of Columbia health insurance exchange to make room for stand-alone children’s dental plans.

Representatives for Delta Dental, MetLife and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America say creating a market for stand-alone dental coverage for children would help families buy better coverage for their children and cut the families’ dental bills.

Consumer groups question whether stand-alone dental coverage will be a viable product.

Medical insurers say building children’s dental benefits into all exchange plans is easier and better for the children.

Members of the board of the D.C. Health Benefit Exchange Authority — the body that oversees the DC Health Link exchange — are preparing to talk about 2015 dental plan options at a meeting Wednesday.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires exchange plans to cover a package of “essential health benefits” that includes dental benefits for children.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says an exchange can meet the requirement by offering stand-alone dental plans for children, even if the major medical plans don’t offer dental benefits.

The District of Columbia requires insurers to sell all new individual major medical coverage through its exchange. The four insurers offering individual “qualified health plans” through the exchange this year all built children’s dental benefits into the QHPs.

D.C. insurance regulators decided that, because all of the individual QHPs included children’s dental coverage, consumers had no need for stand-alone dental plans. Regulators refused to approve the sale of any stand-alone children’s dental plans.

Dental insurers can still sell stand-alone dental coverage for adults and families, but, because of the way the D.C. market is set up, dental insurers can no longer sell any stand-alone children’s dental plans, either inside or outside the exchange.

Major medical insurers say one advantage of the current rules is that all children in the district now have dental coverage.

At some state exchanges, only a minority of children are getting dental coverage.

But dental insurer reps say the embedded dental benefits can expose families, to huge, unexpected dental bills.

Families with a $4,000 QHP deductible may have to meet the full $4,000 deductible before the QHP will pay to fill a child’s cavity.

Moreover, because the QHP out-of-pocket maximum applies to both medical and dental expenses, a family with a $30,000 out-of-pocket maximum might have to spend as much as $30,000 on dental care for a child before the out-of-pocket maximum would kick in and the plan would cover the full cost of the care.

A D.C. exchange dental plan working group has proposed limiting the deductible for in-network children’s dental services to $50 for individuals and $100 for families.

The working group has talked about the possibility of letting QHP issuers continue to build children’s dental benefits into all of their exchange plans, if they want to do that, and asking D.C. insurance regulators to let dental issuers sell stand-alone dental coverage through the exchange.

“This would permit consumers to select a stand-alone dental plan if they thought it was a superior option, even if it duplicates benefits in their main QHP,” working group members say in a report on their discussions. 

See also:


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.