Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance > Your Practice

Bill would split broker comp from MLR

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A bipartisan bill that would separate broker compensation from the medical law ratio under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is earning praise from brokers and agents who have argued that the law’s provision is threatening their livelihood.

The Access to Professional Health Insurance Advisors Act — H.R. 2328 — introduced Wednesday by Reps. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., and John Barrow, D-Ga., would clarify that broker compensation is not part of the medical loss ratio calculation as enacted in PPACA.

PPACA dictates health insurers must spend at least $.80 of every dollar in premiums on actual health care costs in the individual and small group markets, and $0.85 in the large group market. To comply with the law, insurers have to cut back on commissions — making it impossible for many brokers to continue the way they do business as is.

The MLR requirement went into effect Jan. 1, 2011.

The association Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America this week praised the bill saying the legislation would “preserve consumer access to agents and brokers.”

“Since going into effect more than two years ago, the MLR regulations have had a detrimental impact on agents and brokers,” Charles Symington, IIABA senior vice president for external and government affairs said in a statement.

The impact of the MLR rules on agents and brokers has been damaging since many insurance carriers have significantly cut their agent compensation to comply with the regulations.

“This means jobs are being cut, agents and brokers are beginning to disappear, and small businesses and individuals are having a harder time accessing affordable insurance,” Rogers said this week.

IIABA argued that in turn the MLR calculation has reduced consumer access to agents and brokers, leading to “a detrimental effect on essential services provided” such as guidance in claims processing and tailoring health plans to fit the needs of individuals and businesses.

This isn’t the first time Barrow and Rogers have tried to push this legislation.

Last fall, the House Energy and Commerce Committee passed their similar bill — H.R. 1206 — but it failed to reach a full vote.

Republicans generally supported the bill, saying it would protect the jobs of agents and brokers, while Democrats argued it would weaken an important consumer protection.

Democrats have had some ammo in their argument.

Just last week, the Kaiser Family Foundation said that PPACA’s MLR provision saved consumers in the individual market an estimated $2.1 billion last year — the bulk of it on lower premiums costs.

Barrow said this week that “insurance agents and brokers serve as the voice of health insurance for millions of families and small businesses in rural communities.”

“These folks can help explain to consumers the many changes taking place in the health care world over the next few years, and it’s important that their ability to inform the public isn’t weakened by this new law.”

Poll after poll has found that consumers and employers alike remain confused over the implications of PPACA, with many stating they’re turning to brokers to help guide them through the regulations.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.