If you’re a broker, advisor, provider, or administrator of tax-advantaged, account-based health benefits plansor an employer who sponsors these plans for your employees–you have two choices as the effects of the 2,700+ page Affordable Care Act (ACA) unfold:
- Sit back and wait to see what happens as the Obama administration develops and issues an anticipated 20,000+ pages of regulations to implement the ACA; or
- Take action now to influence and shape how those 2,700+ ACA pages are interpreted.
Members of my group, the Employers Council on Flexible Compensation (ECFC), have opted to take action.
We’re advocating for the millions of working Americans participating in Section 125 cafeteria plans.
We’re taking a stand for the middle class, who are struggling to make ends meet; who rely on employer-sponsored tax-advantaged plans to pay for the health care services they need and value most; and who count on those pre-tax benefit contributions to increase their net spendable income.
We can’t sit back while regulators determine the intricate workings of an already complex law, which will result in a cost-shift to the American worker.
What Your Peers Are Reading
At the same time, our members are at the forefront of helping employers provide affordable health care solutions to their employees through the use of tax-advantaged benefit plans. We recognize employee benefits are more than just a plan of insurance. They’re valuable recruitment and retention tools — tools that, for many companies, represent a vital core proposition to attract the best and brightest in their fields.
And we’re having an impact: recently engaging key congressional leaders and administration officials and their staffs in conversations about four key policy changes that will greatly strengthen access and affordability ofand maximize contributions toemployer-sponsored tax-advantaged benefits plans for middle class working Americans:
Policy Change #1: Eliminate the Treasury Department’s “useorlose” (UOL) policy that applies to health flexible spending arrangements (FSAs).
The $2,500 contribution cap, enacted as part of the ACA, necessitates a reassessment of the UOL rule.
An estimated 35 million Americans–most with middle-class incomes–rely on their health FSAs to help afford the care they need. FSAs can be particularly useful to chronically-ill individuals, who see multiple providers on a regular basis and incur expenses for office visits and essential medications; cost-sharing that quickly adds up.
Setting aside pre-tax FSA dollars helps people with chronic conditions pay for the care they need.
Eliminating the UOL rule would provide assurance to employees that the FSA monies they designated to help pay for their health care will be there when they need it in their current plan year, or in the future.
Policy Change #2: Preserve stand-alone health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).